StuckinaBook’s Weekend Miscellany

How is it this hot and it is literal October?? It feels very wrong to still be in a t-shirt, and to have the windows open at home. It continues to be a super busy time, and looks like it might be that way for the foreseeable – but let’s take a breather with a book, a blog post, and a link.

1.) The link – exciting news! I was on Naga Munchetty’s Book Club on Radio Five Live this week, thanks to an invite from Kate of the Book Club Review Podcast. We were meant to have an hour of talking about mid-century novels, but breaking news of the plane hijacking rather squeezed our time. You can listen back here – we were about 12.20-30 and 12.45-1.

2.) The blog post – it’s from a few months ago, but I just discovered it: Wormwoodiana’s thoughts on the centenary of Ronald Fraser’s Flower Phantoms. Includes mention of many books I did my DPhil on, and still an endless source of interest to me.

3.) The book – …and in that review, he mentions R.B. Russell’s Past Lives of Old Books, which I hadn’t heard of (despite loving another of his books about old books). I have a copy from Tartarus Press on its way to me…

#154: Independent Publishers vs Big Name Publishers and Two Virginia Woolf Novels

Virginia Woolf! Publishers! Welcome to episode 154.

In the first half, we compare independent publishers and the big-name publishers – and in the second half, we pit two Virginia Woolf novels against each other: Jacob’s Room and The Waves.

You can support the podcast at Patreon – where you’ll also get access to the exclusive new series ‘5 Books’, where I ask different people about the last book they finished, the book they’re currently reading, the next book they want to read, the last book they bought and the last book they were given.

And, of course, do get in touch at teaorbooks@gmail.com with any questions or comments!

The books and authors we cover in this episode are:

Jane Eyre by Charlotte Bronte
Stone Yard Devotional by Charlotte Wood
And The Crying Wind by Simon Dare
Mary Essex
Ursula Bloom
Shark Heart by Emily Habeck
Lady Into Fox by David Garnett
All I Could Never Be by Beverley Nichols
W. Somerset Maugham
Olga Tokarczuk
A Bite of the Apple by Lennie Goodings
Ducks, Newburyport by Lucy Ellmann
Hugh Walpole
Rose Macaulay
Recommended! by Nicola Wilson
Twice Lost by Phyllis Paul
Ex-Wife by Ursula Parrott
Debbie Voisey
Douglas Bruton
Perfection by Vincenzo Latronico
Ian McEwan
Patricia Brent, Spinster by Herbert Jenkins
Daisy’s Aunt by E.F. Benson
The Rabbits by A.A. Milne
The Lark by E. Nesbit
The Good Companions by J.B. Priestley
Orlando by Virginia Woolf
Mrs Dalloway by Virginia Woolf
To The Lighthouse by Virginia Woolf
The Hours by Michael Cunningham
The Waves (play adaptation) by Flora Wilson Brown
Gaining Ground by Joan Barfoot
The Book of Eve by Constance Beresford-Howe

7 Audiobooks I Have Listened To Recently (Ranked!)

It has been AGES and that wasn’t my intention. Life has been busy and tiring of late, with a real mix of good and not-so-good things. Accompanying me through it all have – of course – been audiobooks. This is a wander through seven audiobooks that I have listened to this year and not written about… And, why not, I’ve ranked them from worst to best.

7. My Year in Paris with Gertrude Stein by Deborah Levy

It’s lowest on my list of seven, but I still enjoyed it. This is a novel about a young woman living in Paris while researching Gertrude Stein, and the friendships and other relationships that develop over that time – with an enormous amount of sidetracking into Stein’s life. My main qualm with it is that it feels like Levy thought about writing a biography of Stein and thought this might be easier to achieve.

6. The Seven-Year Slip by Ashley Poston

My sweet spot of ‘books set in this world but with a fantastic twist’. Clementine works in a very fanciful version of publishing PR and inherits an apartment from her much-loved aunt. She discovers that her aunt’s story is true: the apartment can suddenly travel sevens years back (or forward) in time. That’s how she meets Iwan (pronounced very bizarrely by the narrator) and falls in insta-love with him. It’s a fun idea for a novel, but I would rather have read it outside the romance genre.

5. Lost Boys by James Bloodworth

This is described as a ‘personal journey into the manosphere’, and Bloodworth starts by saying that he has previously been part of these cultish worlds – but it quickly transpires that his participation amounts to little more than an awkward experience at ‘pick-up’ training a very long time ago. I would have found an actual personal experience more interesting (albeit probably more harrowing too), whereas Bloodworth really just writes what any of us with an internet connection might have gathered ourselves.

4. The Library Book by Susan Orlean

Orelan uses the burning down of the Los Angeles Central Library as a starting point to explore the history of libraries – as well as the specifics of the eccentric man who is the main arson suspect. A fascinating and thoroughly researched book, but one which should probably have been cut by about a third.

3. Shark Heart by Emily Habeck

More fantastic literature! In this case, a man is slowly transforming into a shark. It’s not quite set in the real world, because this is a world where metamorphoses are uncommon but known about. Habeck uses this jumping off point for a really poignant depiction of a relationship facing an inescapable obstacle. Get past a few very overwritten pages and you’re in for a treat.

2. Hag-Seed by Margaret Atwood

Whatever genius managed to get some of the leading writers of the day to write novels responding to Shakespeare plays, kudos to you. The series has recently leapt back into life – this is only the second I’ve read, and it is brilliant. Hag-Seed is about an ageing theatre director putting on productions of The Tempest in a prison, but is simultaneously a re-telling of The Tempest. Some of the ending is a bit rushed, but I thought it an exceptionally involving, witty, bold and triumphant character study,

1. Grief is for People by Sloane Crosley

A brilliant memoir – coincidentally, also from the perspective of someone working in publishing PR – of a period in which Sloane Crosley’s home is burgled and her dear friend and boss kills himself. She weaves the two together expertly, while also recognising and foregrounding the ways in which they are not comparable – grief is, after all, for people. It is a complex, moving, and unusual exploration of grief and of a friend, and of the limits of knowing anybody else.

Opening Night (2026) by Sara Baume

I was in a small independent bookshop in Clapham when I came across Opening Night (2026) by Sara Baume. I have a self-imposed rule that I can’t leave an independent bookshop empty-handed – yes, very self-sacrificial, I know – and I am increasingly drawn to the memoir section if I don’t have anything else obvious to purchase. For the past five or six years, we seem to have been in a particularly interesting time for memoirs, often by otherwise un-famous people. Baume doesn’t fall into that category, because she is already a noted author, but I didn’t know that when I bought Opening Night.

The book tells of the friendship between Baume and Mollie Douthit. Mollie is an American artist who has moved to Ireland to pursue her art, and Sara is an Irish author. Neither has achieved riches from her creativity, but both recognise in each other the single-minded, emotionally complex mind of a fellow artist.

The two first meet at Sara’s friend Sue’s – I wouldn’t usually use first names of author and subject like this, but something about the book makes it feel more appropriate. Sue ‘has organised a group exhibition in her partially constructed eco-house’, which tells you everything about the sort of milieu we’re in. It is a world where people care deeply about creativity and shared experiences and introducing like-minded people to one another.

At the exhibition, Sara’s attention is arrested by a painting showing a bedroom. She describes it, though thankfully it is one of many artworks printed in the book (and you can see it here).’I feel as it I were seeing the room from multiple directions at once,’ writes Sara. ‘There was something synchronously ordered and disorientating about it, inviting and confining.’

After quizzing the host, Sara learns that Mollie lives near her – and that’s the organic beginning of a friendship that is the light of this book. So few books – fiction or non-fiction – give adult friendship the attention it deserves. I loved the way she tells of their closeness, its ebbs and flows, its obstacles and oases. She gives friendship the same value as romantic relationship, and recognises the glories and the pitfalls in the same way.

The book is also, of course, a portrait of an artist. As you can tell from that snippet above, Sara Baume knows how to write perceptively about art, and indeed she has written many essays for art catalogues. But, as she explains, she prefers to do that through the lens of her own experiences and emotions – how she responds to the artwork she is seeing. Opening Night is something of a book-length attempt to do that. I really appreciated how many of Mollie’s paintings are reproduced in the book, but also the explanations of how and when Sara saw them – and sometimes an invitation into the artistic process behind them.

Then she pointed to the part of the painting where the bird’s feet intersected with the railing and said that’s why I am not a real painter, and laughed, and it took me a few moments and a closer look to understand what she meant. There was a ridge running through the feet following the line of the iron beneath, and a real painter would have known from the beginning to leave a gap in the black to create a perch, or a real painter would have made the mistake but corrected it with sandpaper and linseed and all the original shades of blue and black and umber, making it flush again. But Mollie had noticed, and chosen instead to celebrate the flaw, to point it out to me, and I thought about this often over the following months, about how she always knew exactly what she was trying to achieve in a painting, even when it might appear to others to be a strange choice. I thought about how Mollie seemed to be completely in control of her paintings, and considerably less in control of her life.

It is a book that is being lived as it is being written. After a certain point, the subject and the author both know that their relationship will become another work of art, in the form of Opening Night, and that leads to one of the most interesting paragraphs in the book:

She sent me a text message that evening, a question. She wanted to know what I singled out to write about the day we had just spent together, and for the first time since the beginning of all the writing I felt suddenly defeated. I could never get it all down, I thought, or even come close. The things that stood out in my memory varied from moment to moment. I would never be able to corral it all into a single form, to tell a coherent story. And I understood then, better than ever, why Mollie painted in the jarring way she did, how each composition was a war of memories, a prodigious compression, a sympathetic compromise.

Despite knowing that Mollie is likely to read the book, Sara writes with candour throughout. There is a certain jealousy when Mollie’s romantic relationship with a man in another country starts to deepen. There are moments of frustration and misunderstanding. It had, in fact, the mingling of honesty and love that normally only comes in memoirs written about a friend who has died.

We get to know Mollie as a person and as an artist. And one very moving, involving element was not part of the book’s scope initially: Mollie develops severe pain in her teeth. Endless trips to dentists and doctors do not seem to offer lasting solutions, and this pain becomes one of the dominant factors in Mollie’s life – and in their friendship. When Mollie updates Sara, it is often about the pain first, and the art later. It’s amazing she’s able to continue creating at all. At various times in my life, I’ve had significant, distracting, non-life-threatening pain that doctors (and sometimes dentists) have been unable to diagnose and it is rare to see that experience reflected. I hadn’t expected it in the book, but I found it one of the more emotive threads.

I’ve read a few books about artists recently, and Opening Night really stands out for how it considers relationship and art, intertwined. Baume (back to last names!) is an excellent, subtle, thoughtful writer – she treads the line excellently between straightforward narrative and philosophical reflection. It never feels unnecessarily flowery, but she manages to get to real poetic depth in her writing. I thought it was an exceptionally interesting, unusual and immersive book, and I’m so glad I made the spontaneous purchase.

StuckinaBook’s Weekend Miscellany

Happy weekend, everyone! I had the day off on Friday (to recover from working at a Christian festival last weekend) and spent most of it reading and relaxing, which was lovely. It also means I’ve totally lost track of what day it is. But I’m pretty sure it’s now the weekend… and so here is a book, a blog post, and a link for you.

1.) The book – three years ago I wrote about R.C. Sherriff’s brilliant memoir, No Leading Lady. It focuses largely on the genesis, writing, staging and success of Journey’s End, as well as looking at his other works, his home, and his beautiful relationship with his mother. Well, it was also impossible to find copies of it. But thankfully that is no longer the case! It is now available in two volumes from Slightly Foxed Editions! I’m delighted that it’s back in print and urge you to get your hands on the limited edition copies.

2.) The link – it is time for Spinster September again! Nora can explain…

3.) The blog post – …and Radhika has some recommendations for books you might enjoy during it.

The Scheme for Full Employment (2003) by Magnus Mills

I was keen to introduce my book group to Magnus Mills, and also to choose one of his books that I hadn’t read yet – so earlier this year I got them reading The Scheme for Full Employment (2003). Read on for why I regretted that decision…

The Scheme for Full Employment was Mills’ fourth novel, following on from my favourite of his, Three To See The King. It is narrated by a man on The Scheme, specifically a delivery driver who drives UniVans between depots. It is one of the routine tasks introduced to make sure that everyone in the country is employed. Vans go between depots on specific routes, sometimes empty, because following the schedule is more important than being purposeful.

Now I have to say I could see Len’s point. The success of The Scheme depended above all else on appearances. It was popular because people could see it in operation on a daily basis. When a UniVan passed by, it reminded onlookers that all across the country men and women were occupied in gainful employment. Eight hours’ work for eight hours’ pay: that was the deal, and everyone agreed it was fair. What worried Len was the number of early finishes that were being dished out by lenient superintendents. He saw this as a threat to The Scheme’s public support, and he obviously thought I agreed with him. Well, of course I did in principle, but to tell the truth, I quite liked the occasional early swerve, as we called it. It was a nice treat to go home at four o’clock on the odd day if things were quiet. Or half past three even. Certainly, it wasn’t a perk I took for granted, but neither did I wish to give it up entirely.

The work is tedious and rote, but the narrator – and everyone else – seems to take this for granted. While people grumble about officious supervisers or dull companions, there is no real serious consternation with the principle of The Scheme itself. When someone does raise the issue of not having enough to do, the narrator replies:

“The point is,” I said, “there’s a difference between full employment and being fully employed. True, there is a lot of spare capacity in The Scheme, but it’s better for people to be paid to do very little than have no job at all, isn’t it?”

For a large section of the book, the narrator just describes his shifts. We learn a little about the people he is working alongside, though they are largely interchangeable. It is, frankly, pretty boring. I think it’s meant to echo how boring the job is, and it does lull you into a sort of rhythm that has its own merits as a reading experience – but I’m not sure this is a very successful novel.

What makes Mills so brilliant, in my eyes, is the way that he somehow lends matter-of-fact stories an underlying feeling of dread. And, at the same time, humour. His novels often fill me with misgivings at the same time as making me laugh. And… I didn’t really get that with The Scheme for Full Employment. The banal surface was there, but I missed the clever undercurrents. There was only one really funny line in the book, and that was spoiled in the blurb. Having said that, I did also get some less laugh-out-loud humour from the concept of UniVan-spotters, who are experts in the very mundane vans, in the way of trainspotters.

Things do get more interesting when the issue of early knock-offs becomes central – the swervers and the flat-dayers take up arms against each other, and protest and enmity take over. It is the nearest I got to understanding the book being labelled a satire. Because, for the most part, I couldn’t work out what was meant to be satirical about it.

Look, it’s Mills, and he has a certain magic that will keep me reading even his least successful work. But I regretted that I introduced my book group to him with this novel, rather than Three To See The King or The Restraint of Beasts or All Quiet on the Orient Express. I guess his sort of unusual approach to a book is a gamble – it’ll either pay off brilliantly, or leave you with something a bit humdrum.

#153: Do We Care If Writers Exaggerate? and When The Cranes Fly South vs Only About Love

Liars, Lisa Ridzen, and Debbi Voisey – welcome to episdoe 153!

In the first half, we talk about our expectations of truth in the non-fiction we read, inspired by the hoo-ha over The Salt Path. In the second half, we compare When The Cranes Fly South by Lisa Ridzen with Only About Love by Debbi Voisey.

You can support the podcast at Patreon – where you’ll also get access to the exclusive new series ‘5 Books’, where I ask different people about the last book they finished, the book they’re currently reading, the next book they want to read, the last book they bought and the last book they were given.

And, of course, do get in touch at teaorbooks@gmail.com with any questions or comments!

The books and authors we mention in this episode are:

Deborah by Esther Kreitman
Isaac Bashevis Singer
May We Feed The King by Rebecca Perry
Helen of Nowhere by Makenna Goodman
The Things We Never Say by Elizabeth Strout
The Odyssey by Homer
Unsayable by Michael Cunningham
David Sedaris
A Million Little Pieces by James Frey
Grief Is For People by Sloane Crosley
The Memory Illusion by Julia Shaw
Rose Macaulay by Constance Babington-Smith
Rose Macaulay: A Writer’s Life by Jane Emery
Rose Macaulay by Sarah LeFanu
Beverley Nichols
The Diary of a Provincial Lady by E.M. Delafield
Mrs Miniver by Jan Struther
All The Dogs of My Life by Elizabeth von Arnim
How The Heather Looks by Joan Bodger
The Crack in the Teacup by Joan Bodger
Curriculum Vitae by Muriel Spark
Letters to Gwen John by Celia Paul
Spare by Prince Harry
Marcel Proust
Temptation by János Székely (is the book Rachel couldn’t remember!)
The Book of Eve by Constance Beresford-Howe
Jacob’s Room by Virginia Woolf
The Waves by Virginia Woolf

Deborah by Esther Kreitman

Esther Kreitman cover in front of bookcase of Virago Modern Classics

For Women in Translation month, I pulled Deborah (1936) by Esther Kreitman, translated from Yiddish by her son, Maurice Carr, in the 1940s. It was a gift from a Virago-loving friend called Alex back in 2020, and it definitely ticking off a language that I’ve never read before.

Deborah is apparently quite autobiographical, following a Rabbi and his family in early-20th-century Poland. Deborah has a brother who teases her, a mother who is apathetic towards her, and a father who is a little lost in lands of unworldliness and more interested in studying scripture than being demonstrative towards his daughter. For a long time, the novel looks at daily life in an insignificant town for a family who are sort of an outlier, socially.

Like so many young heroines in literature, Deborah is spirited, intelligent, and frustrated. She longs for education and for romance, and is offered neither. As a girl, her future is not considered to be worth discussing in comparison to her brother’s – except for marrying her off as suitably as possible. A local sort of matchmaker is forever suggesting possible suitors (each of whom has some sort of catch) and, to do her parents credit, they seem to take her refusals in their stride.

How happy she might have been if only she had been born a boy! It was not without good reason that her father had insisted, way back in Jelhitz, that girls were inferior creatures. Now why on earth could not men and women wear the same clothes? If she was to wear a gaberdine like Michael, then, like him, she could go wherever her fancy took her…

Finances are tight, and Reb Avram Ber (her father) is offered a more prosperous living in Warsaw. Indeed, he is offered the role of Tsadik – something Kreitman never fully explains, but something Reb Avram Ber does not think he can accept. Things go back and forth in some of the novel’s livelier scenes, and the family move to the capital. For Deborah, particularly, it is a totally new world.

“Well, that’s funny! It was only a short journey. And, do you know, I always used to think Warsaw was hundreds of miles away!”

“Yes, that’s just like you! You’re a great thinker, only you always think the wrong thing,” said Michael with a laugh, and Deborah blushed.

What a terribly busy station! And it was all paved with smooth flagstones – just like the description of a big railway station in one of the novels she had been reading. The crowd was seething with excitement – all in a tangle like a swarm of bees. And no one ever stopped, except for a brief instant to snatch a paper from one of the news-vendors. Why all this hurry? Had they all gone mad? Why couldn’t they walk along sensibly like normal people? They were a queer lot!

In this new environment, Deborah manages to get embroiled with a group of Socialists – partly because she is attracted to a young man involved with the movement (Simon) but moreso because she is beguiled by a young woman (Bailka) who is determined, witty and strident – and clearly the sort of person Deborah would like to be. But how can she get away, and start that sort of life?

Deborah learnt to detest her home. She realised only too well that the family had come to look upon her as an hysterical, irrational creature.She began to brood, and her every thought was – how to run away. Young people often left home on account of differences with their parents. When the rift between the old and the new generations became unbridgeable, a parting of the ways was inevitable. That was the course Bailka had taken. But she, Deborah, was not made of the same stuff as Bailka! Now, Baika was a prominent member of the party, but as for herself, she was being spurned by the movement. It was one thing to contemplate action, but another to accomplish it. Anyway, she had nowhere to go, no means of escape.

She spies some chance of escape by marrying the next young man who is suggested to her – but life is equally despondent and unfortunate with him. Her new parents-in-law are unaffectionate and unpredictable. Her husband is a sweet idiot, seemingly incapable of keeping them out of poverty. I found the dynamics of the marriage to be the most interesting part of the novel, and I wish that Kreitman had spent longer on this section. For a novel that is quite slow and steady for the most part, the final 75-100 pages felt a bit rushed – and perhaps a novel about their marriage alone would have felt a bit more focused and a little more satisfying?

Speaking of focused – it’s interesting that the original title was Der Sheydim-Tants (The Dance of the Demons) – and the change in title clearly puts the focus on Deborah. And that does make reading the novel quite strange at the beginning, because we spend rather more time with the Rabbi and his wife than with Deborah, and she doesn’t really emerge as a protagonist until the second half of the book. I did like reading the book, but the choice of title made me feel a bit disoriented, in comparison to the novel I was reading.

Overall, I think it would have been a better novel with a bit more editing and focus – but still an enjoyable read, and valuable to learn more about Jewish lives in Europe before and during the First World War.

Michael Cunningham’s autobiography

I’ve over at Shiny New Books, talking about Michael Cunningham’s new autobiography(?), Unsayable. Here’s the beginning of my review, and you can read the rest at SNB…

When Michael Cunningham set out to write Unsayable, I wonder if it started as a book about writing that couldn’t keep out memoir. Or perhaps it started as a memoir which kept getting sidetracked into advice about writing. Or perhaps – the most likely, given Cunningham’s evident and enviable control over his writing – Unsayable is exactly the combination of the two that he intended.