It’s that time again when I look at a big pile of books I’ve been intending to review, and don’t really have a full-post’s worth of things to say… so here they all are, in a round up. Hope you’re all reading something fun at the moment.
Because of Jane (1913) by J.E. Buckrose
I have a few books by the near-forgotten Buckrose and really like her writing. My hope is that one of them will elevate itself above the others and be good enough for the British Library Women Writers series – but it won’t be Because of Jane. As I’ve written previously, Buckrose is very good on puncturing egos and awkwardness and social manners. She is much more formulaic and less interesting when it comes to romance – and there is a lot of romance in Because of Jane. The central one is ‘spinster’ Beatrice who reluctantly lives with her brother and his wife and daughter, and who begins to fall for a local widower, Stephen Croft.
“They were married at a registrar’s office. That always seems to me a little like buying machine-made underclothing. Doesn’t it to you?”
“Yes – no – I don’t know,” said Beatrice.
“And so,” said Miss Thornleigh, pursuing her train of thought, “it didn’t last. It was never likely to last.”
“I cannot think that Mrs Stephen Croft died because she was married at the registrar’s,” objected Beatrice in common justice.
“Well, perhaps not,” conceded Miss Thornleigh. “But it was a bad start.”
That was one excerpt I enjoyed, but sadly Because of Jane doesn’t have that much in this tone – and a lot more in Jane’s voice. Jane is Beatrice’s seven-year-old niece and the sort of irritating novelistic child who says things with wide-eyed innocence that sum up what other are truly feeling. The book was fine, but rather worse than the other two Buckroses I’ve read.
The ABC of Cats (1960) by Beverley Nichols
Reading the Meow week was the reason I started The ABC of Cats, but I didn’t finish it. He goes through the alphabet, writing about a different aspect of cats for each letter (e.g. Y is Yawn). It’s all delightful, and Nichols does cats extremely well – he is expert on their behaviours, habits, wishes without every getting saccharine or fey. It’s one for cat lovers certainly, and enjoyable if only for his apparent belief that he has invented the cat flap.
Things I Didn’t Throw Out (2017) by Marcin Wicha
Translated from Polish by Marta Dziurosz, this is a non-fiction reflection on Marcin’s mother’s life through the books that she left behind. Perhaps unsurprisingly, they are mostly Polish books – Emma by Jane Austen is the only one I’ve read. The book is also a lens to look at post-war Poland and how the Communist regime affected those who lived there.
I think Wicha writes really well, in sparse, curious way. But I struggle to know what to write about this book except that it’s unusual and beguiling – and probably better if you have a good knowledge of this period in Polish history and literature already, which I do not.
The First To Die at the End (2022) by Adam Silvera
I thought Silvera’s young adult novel They Both Die at the End was a brilliant premise worked out really well – it’s a world where people get a phone call from DeathCast on the day they will die, but aren’t told precisely when or how. And now he’s written The First To Die at the End, a prequel set on the first night that DeathCast is launched.
As before, there are two teenage boys who meet for the first time that day and spend it together – waiting for death (though I won’t spoil whose). It does feel a little like a repeat of the same sort of thing, done a little less compelling and with some extraneous side characters taking up some of the 550 pages. But it’s still a brilliant idea, and Silvera writes very engagingly. I didn’t remember the original book well enough to get all the references or Easter eggs, though did appreciate the two boys from that book appearing here briefly as their younger selves.
It’s always good to read your reviews and readjust my ‘ I would like to read’ list accordingly! I am now rather less keen to read Things I didn’t throw out. This week I have read my first Barbara Trapido (Brother of the famous Jack), and am enjoying my first Natalia Ginzburg (thanks to your review of Sagittarius and Madame Bibi Lophile’s recent review of All my Yesterdays (the one I’m reading). For my non fiction, I’ve just finished Domestic Modernism, the Interwar novel – E H Young by Briganti and Mezei, which has made me keen to read more Young books and was a scholarly but interesting perspective on my favourite type of novel.
I quoted the Briganti and Mezei quite a lot in my doctorate! And the first time I gave a conference paper, the channel was paired by Briganti (I forget her first name). What fun!
I think it was through you that I knew about the Briganti and Mezei! I’m glad that I did and I am now keen to read Nicola Humble and Alison Light’s books on Feminine Middlebrow novels too. Sadly they are not in the library so I might have to wait until I can justify a purchase.
Oh lovely. And Nicola Humble’s book is truly THE one to read in this area – absolutely brilliant, and so readable too. She was my external examiner for my dphil viva, which I was so happy about.
I’m very envious of your connections! Although, I imagine, during your viva you may not have been able to appreciate the meeting as much as in a more relaxed setting!
What a nice range. I really must pick up the Cats’ ABC soon – off to have a browse online!!
Enjoy! He is forgiving to people who prefer dogs :D
Things I Didn’t Throw Out (2017) by Marcin Wicha interests me. Thanks for introducing me to it
thanks Lisa!
Silvera was vaguely on my to read list but I’d clean forgotten, though I think I should start with the YA title. Glad you enjoyed the Nichols. I only found out about his cat books recently having only been aware of the garden ones.
I should say, they’re both YA titles – but I think They Both Die At The End is a better place to start, despite being set later.