All

Jubilee: A book for every year of the Queen’s reign

StuckinaBook All 31 Comments

Happy jubilee weekend to those who are celebrating! I love the Queen and I am certainly celebrating. And what more fitting way for me to celebrate than to pick a book I love for every year of her reign?

Here we go, all 70 of ’em… not necessarily the best book for each year, or even my favourite book, but something I’d recommend. And forgive me if any of the dates are wrong – I’m going by what I have listed in LibraryThing.

1952: The Village by Marghanita Laski
1953: Life Among the Savages by Shirley Jackson
1954: Who Was Changed and Who Was Dead by Barbara Comyns
1955: Mother and Son by Ivy Compton-Burnett
1956: Tea at Four O’Clock by Janet McNeill
1957: A House in the Country by Ruth Adam
1958: Tom’s Midnight Garden by Philippa Pearce
1959: Miss Plum and Miss Penny by Dorothy Evelyn Smith
1960: The L-Shaped Room by Lynne Reid Banks
1961: Told in Winter by Jon Godden
1962: Cassandra at the Wedding by Dorothy Baker
1963: A Day in Summer by J.L. Carr
1964: The Soul of Kindness of Elizabeth Taylor
1965: The Millstone by Margaret Drabble
1966: A Jest of God by Margaret Laurence
1967: At the Jerusalem by Paul Bailey
1968: In Pious Memory by Margery Sharp
1969: A Change for the Better by Susan Hill
1970: The Fantastic by Tzvetan Todorov
1971: Nemesis by Agatha Christie
1972: The Summer Book by Tove Jansson
1973: The Norman Conquests by Alan Ayckbourn
1974: Aunts Aren’t Gentlemen by P.G. Wodehouse
1975: Turtle Diary by Russell Hoban
1976: The Doctor’s Wife by Brian Moore
1977: Injury Time by Beryl Bainbridge
1978: The Bookshop by Penelope Fitzgerald
1979: The Path Through the Trees by Christopher Milne
1980: Housekeeping by Marilynne Robinson
1981: Loitering With Intent by Muriel Spark
1982: Brother of the More Famous Jack by Barbara Trapido
1983: A Very Great Profession by Nicola Beauman
1984: According to Mark by Penelope Lively
1985: The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat by Oliver Sacks
1986: Family Skeletons by Henrietta Garnett
1987: Crossing to Safety by Wallace Stegner
1988: The Birds of the Innocent Wood by Deirdre Madden
1989: Maestro by Peter Goldsworthy
1990: Immortality by Milan Kundera
1991: Wise Children by Angela Carter
1992: The Devil’s Candy by Julie Salamon
1993: Pigs in Heaven by Barbara Kingsolver
1994: The Silent Woman by Janet Malcolm
1995: Flesh and Blood by Michael Cunningham
1996: Bridget Jones’s Diary by Helen Fielding
1997: Enduring Love by Ian McEwan
1998: Ex Libris by Anne Fadiman
1999: All Quiet on the Orient Express by Magnus Mills
2000: Virginia by Jens Christian Grøndahl
2001: Tepper Isn’t Going Out by Calvin Trillin
2002: Crow Lake by Mary Lawson
2003: Alva & Irva by Edward Carey
2004: Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim by David Sedaris
2005: The Lost Art of Keeping Secrets by Eva Rice
2006: A Lifetime Burning by Linda Gillard
2007: Speaking of Love by Angela Young
2008: The Uncommon Reader by Alan Bennett
2009: The Little Stranger by Sarah Waters
2010: The Wrong Place by Brecht Evens
2011: Let Not the Waves of the Sea by Simon Stephenson
2012: The Teleportation Accident by Ned Beauman
2013: Hyperbole and a Half by Allie Brosh
2014: Boy, Snow, Bird by Helen Oyeyemi
2015: Things that Fall from the Sky by Selja Ahava
2016: Miss Fortune by Lauren Weedman
2017: The Diary of a Bookseller by Shaun Bythell
2018: Packing My Library by Alberto Manguel
2019: All The Lives We Ever Lived by Katharine Smyth
2020: Inferno by Catherine Cho
2021: Ghosted by Jenn Ashworth

Aaand… I’ve only actually read one book published in 2022, I think, and it was too bad to include here. So I’ll leave the final year as a blank – hopefully something wonderful comes along before the end of the year.

Happy Jubilee!

Anne Frank’s Diary: the graphic adaptation (Novella a Day in May #31)

StuckinaBook All , , 12 Comments

I made it! 31 days, and 31 books – admittedly some of them played fast and loose with the definition of ‘novella’, not least this final one. But what a fun time it has been, and has brought out some real gems – A Jest of God by Margaret Laurence was definitely top of the pile, but some other wonderful books alongside. Thank you so much, Madame Bibi, for creating this challenge and for doing it alongside me. It’s been really fun to see what you read, where we overlap, and where there are massive differences. I’m running out of novellas on my shelves now, but already looking forward to next year.

Today, I read a graphic work of non-fiction – Anne Frank’s diary, adapted by Ari Folman and illustrated by David Polonsky. I think it came as a review copy back when it was published in 2018, and I’m so glad I finally read it.

You doubtless all know Anne Frank’s story, and have read her diary – one of the great works of the 21st century, in my opinion, documenting life in a hidden annexe for a group of Jewish family and friends in Amsterdam. What makes the original book so incredible is all here – the extraordinary and the everyday, the teenage girl struggling against her parents’ authority and finding first love – and the girl who knows one wrong move would lead to them all being murdered. She is perceptive, witty, thoughtful, hopeful. And Folman does a brilliant job of keeping that all here.

It is shorter than the diary, of course, and mostly given in typical graphical novel ‘cartoon strip’ style, though some pages are given over to full entries. Polonsky’s illustrations capture the portrait we know so well, and convey the character and spirit of Anne.

In some instances (as explained in an afterword), they have condensed many entries into one illustration – for instance, Anne often compares herself to her sister, and obsesses over their differences. That was turned into this page:

Anne Frank's Diary: The Graphic Adaptation by Ari Folman

I was a bit worried that this would be odd or gimmicky, or take away from the extraordinary original. But I think it’s a moving and beautiful way to re-encounter Anne’s story – a new angle on that testimony to man’s inhumanity to man, and yet the survival of humanity in the darkest of situations.

Rolling in the Dew by Ethel Mannin (Novella a Day in May #30)

StuckinaBook All , , 11 Comments

If you read about middlebrow women writers of the interwar years, you’ll doubtless have come across Ethel Mannin’s name. I don’t know if she had one book that was particularly well-known, but she was astonishingly prolific, as you can see on her Wikipedia page. I have three of her books but hadn’t read any, until Rolling in The Dew – one of three books she published in 1940.

The title comes from a George Orwell quote – Google tells me it’s in Coming Up For Air, but Mannin’s dedication gives the game away: ‘To George Orwell, who so abominates ‘the bearded, fruit-juice drinking sandal-wearers’ of the ‘roll-in-the-dew-before-breakfast’ school.’

Though published after war had started, it is set in the summer of 1939. Our hero, Pierre Mirelli, is a Frenchman living in England who stumbles across a colony living in the middle of nowhere.

“My name is Dewberry,” the big man informed him, “Rudolf Dewberry. You’re French, aren’t you? I thought do. We’ve no French here. Some Austrian and Czech refugees. And we did have some Basque children for a time. But no French.” He seemed sad about it.

Mirelli did not know what to say to this, his country not yet having produced refugees, so he merely smiled with an air of apology.

Dewberry continued heavily, “The world is in a sad mess, my young friend. The nations of Europe are as the Gadarene swine. Here in this community we have created an ideal world in miniature. But a practical ideal. Here we live in the spirit of Kropotkin’s mutual aid, each co-operating in the common good, yet each respecting the sanctity of the individual.”

One thing leads to another, and Mirelli finds that he has agreed to join the community at a conference in Geneva, where they will be addressed by Dr Krang, a pupil of Freud’s. Mirelli mostly wants to go because it means his passage will be paid to Europe, where he will be able to visit his fiancée Marthe. He has been asked to deliver a lecture, seemingly just on the strength of representing a nationality that haven’t yet got covered. Dubious, amused, nervous – he goes.

The community is not in-line with the life Mirelli would wish to lead. He discovers that they all follow the brilliantly-named Haybox-Schnitzel diet: vegetarian, non-alcoholic, and largely consisting of what looks like sawdust to Mirelli. There’s one character who lives off bran and fruit, and is hoping to wean herself off the fruit. (As a vegetarian who doesn’t drink, I could live with this diet – but the foodstuffs that are mentioned are still very unappetising.)

Of course, it is all very old hat to tease health groups and hippies and people who advocate getting back to nature, swimming in cold water before breakfast, doing yoga etc etc. In 1940, I imagine it was a little newer (if not entirely new). But it is not mean-spirited humour, and Mannin interestingly links it to all manner of contemporary sociopolitical conversations – from religious faith to Freudianism to capitalism to fascism. While her tongue is always in her cheek, she does take the delightfully over-the-top premise and sustains it into something very interesting. And it helps that Mirelli is such an endearing, sympathetic character in the midst of this maelstrom.

Mannin’s writing is a joy, too. She has some wonderfully dry lines, which reminded me of E.M. Delafield. Like when she introduces Mrs Dewberry, ‘for she was that, however much her Rudolf might seek to lessen the bourgeois shamefulness of it by referring to her as his female companion’. I suspect Rolling in the Dew is something of an outlier in her work, inasmuch as she doesn’t appear to have usually been a satirist, but it has encouraged me that her enjoyable writing style will be transferred to more ‘ordinary’ topics. I have Proud Heaven and Cactus waiting for me, so watch this space.

Novella a Day in May: Days 28 and 29

StuckinaBook All , , , , , , , 11 Comments

Day 28: Sleepless Nights (1979) by Elizabeth Hardwick

Elizabeth Hardwick is one of those authors who has been published both as Virago Modern Classic and a NYRB Classic, and there can few greater accolades (other than being a British Library Women Writers author, am I right??) I bought Sleepless Nights back in 2009, and have a couple other books by Hardwick on my shelf, but have yet to read any.

In this novella, a woman looks back on her life – a jumble of recollections and reflections.

It is June. This is what I have decided to do with my life just now. I will do this work of transformed and even distorted memory and lead this life, the one I am leading now. Every morning the blue clock and the crocheted bedspread with its pink and blue and gray squares and diamonds. How nice it is – this production of a broken old woman in a squalid nursing home. The niceness and the squalor and sorrow in an apathetic battle – that is what I see. More beautiful is the table with the telephone, the books and magazines, the Times at the door, the birdsong of rough, grinding trucks in the street.

That is the opening paragraph, and gives an indication of Hardwick’s striking, rather brilliant prose. And I don’t have a lot to say about Sleepless Nights, because my experience of it was finding her writing absolutely sumptuous and wonderful, and seldom having any idea what was going on. Names would recur, but I was unable to attach much by way of character to them. There is a lovely few pages on Billie Holiday, who is the only name I can remember, a day after reading the novella.

But, nevertheless, I enjoyed reading it. Because each sentence is a little masterpiece. It was like relishing a series of beautiful brushstrokes, but seeing them as abstract mini-artworks, rather than cohering into a single portrait. I daresay that is partly that ‘transformed and even distorted memory’, but mainly because of me. I find I am less and less able to put together a novel told in this abstract way, where beauty is prioritised over clarity. But, as I say, that didn’t stop me enjoying and admiring it. Just probably not quite the way that was intended.

To finish on Hardwick, here’s another quote I noted down:

“Shame is inventive,” Nietzsche said. And that is scarcely the half of it. From shame I have paid attention to clothes, shoes, rings, watches, accents, teeth, points of deportment, turns of speech. The men on the train are wearing clothes which, made for no season, are therefore always unseasonable and contradictory. They are harsh and flimsy, loud and yet lightweight, fashioned with the inappropriateness that is the ruling idea of the year-round. pastels blue as the sea and green as the land; jackets lined with paisley and plaid; seams outlined with wide stitches of another color; revers and pockets outsize; predominance of chilly blue and two-tones; nylon and Dacron in the as-smooth-as-glass finish of the permanently pressed.

Day 29: The Peculiar Life of a Lonely Postman (2005) by Denis Thériault

What a perfect little novella The Peculiar Life of a Lonely Postman is. Translated from French by Liedewy Hawke, Thériault’s book is a perfect use of the form – using the slim space to somehow make something with a beauty that depends on delicacy and brevity.

Bilodo is a postman in his late-20s, and perfectly happy. ‘He wouldn’t have wanted to swap places with anyone in the world. Except perhaps with another postman.’ He doesn’t have a girlfriend and doesn’t have many close friends. When he is not delivering letters up and down the many, many steps of the tall buildings on rue des Hêtres, he mostly spends his time in his small apartment, playing videogames and ignoring the attempts of a colleague to find him a girl.

But he does have one illicit pastime:

Among the thousands of soulless pieces of paper he delivered on his rounds, he occasionally came across a personal letter – a less and less common items in this era of email, and all the more fascinating for being so rare. When that happened, Bilodo felt as excited as a prospector spotting a gold nugget in his pan. He did not deliver that letter. Not right away. He took it home and steamed it open. That’s what kept him so busy at night in the privacy of his apartment.

And, one day, one of the envelopes he steams open only includes this:

Under clear water
the newborn baby
swims like a playful otter

He discovers that a woman in Guadalupe, Ségolène, is exchanging haikus with a man on Bilodo’s postal route, Grandpré. Of course, Bilodo can only read Ségolène’s side of the exchange – but he grows obsessed with her, with the haiku form, with this curious relationship that expresses itself solely, and slowly, through the exchange of written verse.

I don’t want to spoil more of the novella, which only comes in at 108 pages, but Bilodo gets much more involved in the correspondence. And the end of The Peculiar Life of a Lonely Postman is unexpected, brilliant, and curiously beautiful. I gasped, and yet it is the sort of denouement that confirms the beauty of what has gone before.

This is the second novella I’ve read this May about someone discovering a stranger’s personality through their verse, and I think does it more subtly. I’m so impressed by Hawke’s ability to translate the Haikus in a way that, I assume, keeps both their original meaning and the feel. Because the feel is the most important part. And the feel of the whole novella is lovely – precise, delicate, poignant.

The Colour of Evening by Robert Nathan (Novella a Day in May #27)

StuckinaBook All , , 2 Comments

I love Robert Nathan novel(la)s for when I need something simple and lovely. He is best remembered now for the film adaptations of his works – The Bishop’s Wife, The Preacher’s Wife, and Portrait of Jennie – and far easier to find in the US than the UK, but I snap up any I come across. They are never at all demanding, and have no claims to being great literature. But there is something refreshing about spending time in one.

The Colour of Evening (1960) came towards the end of his long and prolific career. (Incidentally, it was also filmed in 1990.) It concerns an old painter called Max Loeb who lives south of Santa Monica, painting portraits and getting enough interest from the public to get by, just barely. He is filled with disdain about modern art – which seems to encompass artists who were well past being ‘modern’ by the time this book came out – and Nathan seems to assume his readership will have the same outlook. This disdain stretches out to include the idea of realism in art and literature, as opposed to anything idealised or beautiful.

“Realism,” grumbled Max, sketching away. “You call it realism what we get? Is a bone with gristle on it realism? Maybe – for a cemetery. Do you know what true realism is? It is the bone inside the flesh, under the living tissue: paint that, or write about it! Even in the newspapers you can find out what is going on with our artists, or sometimes in a magazine at the barber shop. Do you know what I think about these books you read? They are not like life, because in life everybody is not such a good-for-nothing.”

Alongside Max is his landlady, Mrs Hermione Bloemendal, and Jon Kuzik. Or sometimes ‘John’, which I think was a failing in the copyeditor, rather than a deliberate trick. Mrs Bloemendal sometimes poses for portraits; Jon is Max’s pupil, and pays him in money or, more often, in kind. They have a quiet, contented dynamic between the three of them. They care for each other, but in a calm way.

Into this world comes Halys – a young woman in a dirty dress, desperate for any work or way to keep going. Well, desperate in the sort of picturesque way of a Robert Nathan novel, which will never get too unpleasant. She moves into this delicate ecosystem, earning her keep by cleaning and posing for portraits. Only things start to go awry when Max wonders if he is in love with her, and the careful balance of the existing friendships get challenged…

This sort of plot could make for a very dramatic novel, but The Colour of Evening remains quiet and contemplative even when Nathan is infusing it with event. I think that’s largely because characters are often given to philosophising, or exchanging moral conclusions that are a little bit saccharine. The sort of tropes that might belong in a chatty magazine.

It’s all perfectly enjoyable, though I think Nathan is better when these maxims and pronouncements about life and love are offset by his quirky plots. In other books of his I’ve read, there is often a fantastic streak – a girl whose ageing is off-kilter, a character who comes to life, a boat that sails through roads to the sea. Without that whimsy or fantasia, it feels a bit fey. He needs to add in the strange and unworldly to balance out his sentimental tone.

But I still always enjoy my time with Nathan. I wouldn’t recommend this one to start, but it was what I needed today.

The Home by Penelope Mortimer (Novella a Day in May #26)

StuckinaBook All , , 10 Comments

THE HOME | Penelope MortimerLook, yes, I’m cheating again – The Home (1971) isn’t a novella, since it’s 230 pages, but I had a bit more time to read today, and I thought I’d spend it here. And I’m so glad I did – The Home is brilliant (and, indeed, rather better IMO than the other Mortimer I read earlier in May, My Friend Says It’s Bullet-Proof).

The home of the title is the one that Eleanor Strathearn moves to after leaving her husband Graham – because of his affair with a younger woman, also called Eleanor though known as Nell. He has bought her the house, under some sufferance, and she has taken almost all the furniture. She goes with their youngest son, Philip (15) – they have four other children, adults living lives of careful detachment from their parents.

The course of the novel follows the aftermath of this split, and brings in their respective mothers too. Mortimer is brilliant at combining different permutations of the family and showing the dynamics that emerge – sometimes confiding, sometimes awkward, usually fraught in some way.

What I loved most about The Home is the tone of voice. Mortimer is drily funny and quite odd, and fans of Muriel Spark or Beryl Bainbridge will find a lot to enjoy. Her descriptions of people are always slightly off-kilter and wonderful. Here is Eleanor’s mother, Mrs Bennet:

While not exactly believing in God – the prospect was a little ridiculous – she was devoted to death, regarding it as the cure for all evils, by which she meant life. However, she remained indomitably alive. Other elderly ladies – at the time of the break-up she was eighty-two – suffered from fluttering hearts, poor eyesight, deafness, arthritis. Mrs Bennet was healthier than she had been at eighteen, and as much in command of her faculties. She also grew more knowledgeable every year, and was now far better informed about politics, the arts, drug addiction, space travel, sexual permissiveness and other topics of absolutely no use to her than her husband, a gentleman farmer and Justice of the Peace, had ever been.

There is a cynicism about romance and relationships throughout The Home – one character says, “Whoever heard of a happily married couple in 1971?” – but there is also a sort of hope that is as indomitably alive as Mrs Bennet. Or at least a triumph of hope over experience. Everybody wants slightly different things, and knowingly damages and disregards the people around them in pursuit of these things – but doing so, at the same time, with genuine love and care. It is all excellently observed.

I don’t know The Home is less well-known than some of Mortimer’s other books. It probably isn’t quite the exhilarating tour de force of The Pumpkin Eater, but it is certainly recognisable as the same brilliant authorial mind. I loved it.

Maigret’s Revolver by Georges Simenon (Novella a Day in May #25)

StuckinaBook All , , , 16 Comments

Whenever Karen and I run a club year, there is a Georges Simenon – and every time I comment that I must read something by him. And as I was glancing around my shelves, I spotted that Maigret’s Revolver (1952, translated by Nigel Ryan) is really short – and why not? So I have now read my first Simenon, and finally met Inspector Maigret.

He is straight-forward man, more compassionate than he needs to be but also unlikely to fly into any sort of passion. He drinks an extraordinary amount, and finds the fact that he can’t get whisky in an English hotel before 11.30am absurd. He is determined to solve a mystery, but seem content to achieve that aim with measured and thoughtful steps.

The mystery, in this case, starts with the revolver of the title – a young man is waiting in Maigret’s study, but has gone before Maigret gets home. He discovers that his revolver is missing. The revolver itself was a gift that he has never used, but it is still fully functioning. He quickly learns that a young man matching the description of this mysterious figure (for Maigret’s wife met him, and could describe him a little) has been buying gun cartridges.

Along the way, after some fortunate policework, Maigret is led to the discovery of a body…

I really enjoyed reading this. It has a dry humour that I didn’t know would be there, and Maigret is a more interesting and likeable character than I’d realised. He is not hard-boiled or maverick – he is human and sensible, and engages with fellow professionals. Something I particularly liked in the writing was the treatment of women, who are frequently intelligent and not thrown by the strange circumstances they find themselves in. A lovely contrast to the common figure of detective novels from this era, where women fall apart in hysterics when questioned or when faced with difficult circumstances.

Here, for instance, is part of a questioning with one female character. I think it shows what I liked of Maigret’s dogged patience, and the quick-witted assuredness that Simenon gives women. In this novella, at least. I don’t know how much of an anomaly that is.

“You know your father’s ill?”

“He always has been.”

There was no pity, no emotion in her voice.

“He’s in bed.”

“Very likely.”

“Your brother’s disappeared.”

He saw that she was startled, that this piece of news took her aback more than she was willing to admit.

“That doesn’t surprise you?”

“Nothing surprises me.”

“Because I’ve seen too much. What exactly do you want from me?”

It was difficult to reply point blank to such a straight question, and she calmly took a cigarette from a case and asked:

“Have you a light?”

He lit a match for her.

“I’m waiting.”

“How old are you?”

“I presume it wasn’t just to find out my age that you took all this trouble. According to your badge, you aren’t a plain sergeant, but a Chief-Inspector. In other words, someone important.”

As for the plot itself – it’s a little flimsy as a mystery, but works well as a story. If Maigret’s Revolver is anything to go by, Simenon is more interesting as a novelist of characters than of puzzles. I’m glad I’ve finally read some Simenon, and it certainly won’t be my last. And do let me know if my conclusions based on this single book are wide of the mark or not!

Friends and Relations by Elizabeth Bowen (Novella a Day in May #24)

StuckinaBook All , , 16 Comments

I was inspired by the latest Backlisted episode to pick up a Bowen – specifically the one they covered, Death of the Heart, but it turns out that I don’t own it – so I substituted a novella of 151 pages, Friends and Relations (1931). It’s not one I see people talk about all that much, but I thought it on par with her others – the usual hallmarks of exceptionally beautiful and perceptive writing, and a plot that is never quite obvious.

The story opens at the wedding of Laurel Studdart and James Tilney. It is a very proper, slightly passionless affair. I loved this exchange, showing Bowen’s talent for dialogue that does a lot more than is evident on the surface.

‘You might hold your lilies,’ said Mrs Studdart, who had discovered the sheaf on a hall table specially cleared for the top-hats.

‘Oh, Mother, I can’t; they’re heavy.’

‘But don’t you think it would be nice, Edward, if she were to hold her lilies?’

‘I don’t know,’ said Edward. ‘Do people generally?’

‘They’d be such a strain on one arm all the time. You see I can’t change them; I must keep my right arm for shaking hands.’

‘And shake hands lightly,’ said Mrs Studdart, ‘don’t grip.’

‘Did I look …?’

‘Lovely, lovely,’ said Mrs Studdart. She was looking round distractedly for a vase and soon found one, a kind of Italian urn in which she arranged the lilies beside the bride.

It’s not long before Laurel’s sister Janet gets married – though this is rather more of a surprise to the family, as Janet was not expected to do anything so fortunate and conventional. What’s a little less conventional is that she is marrying the nephew of the man who had an adulterous affair with Edward’s mother. If that sentence is a little confusing, fear not, it’s clear in the book – essentially the dark horses in the family tree of both sisters’ new husbands are tangled together.

I found Laurel and Janet both rather unknowable. I’d be hard pressed to describe their personalities, and perhaps that reflects the rather controlled conversations they have with each other – appropriately sisterly to appearances, but without giving too much away.

On the other hand there is Theodora, easily my favourite character in Friends and Relations, and the most vivid. We see her first as a 15 year old at the wedding, pressing ice creams on unwilling guests and believing herself to be doing a great kindness, loudly berating her parents for huddling together, and evading speaking to the bride by walking outside and round the building to get to the food. She dominates her parents, finding them deeply embarrassing and forever correcting things that only a child would notice. It is a pitch perfect portrait, and funny too.

We move forward ten years into the past – both marriages have children, Theodora is still around, and the dark horses of the past are still having their effect on the future. There is a turning point in this section, but also the sense that the past lingers long over future generations.

I found I didn’t always know exactly what was going on, partly because Bowen’s writing is too complex to rush-read in a novella-a-day challenge, and partly because everybody prevaricates. The dialogue is never there for exposition; it is more realistic, and gives a rich sense of the relationships between people, rather than the details of the plot. I had to go back and re-read bits to try and piece things together. But it didn’t stop me enjoying Bowen’s striking writing. So many lovely sentences – I noted down one about a cat, of course: “The Siamese, reappearing like a malign sun over the cushions, looked at his mistress with penetration, without sympathy.”

Ultimately, I might land more on admiring Bowen than loving her – but there is so much to admire that that is no weak praise.

Novella a Day in May: Days 22 and 23

StuckinaBook All , , 16 Comments

Day 22: Grand Canyon (1942) by Vita Sackville-West

I re-read Vita Sackville-West’s novella set in an alternative 1942 where Nazi Germany has successfully taken over Europe, and refugees have fled to America. This book focuses on the occupants of a hotel on the edge of the Grand Canyon – and what happens when bombs come to the hotel. I won’t say anymore because Rachel and I will be discussing it on an upcoming episode of ‘Tea or Books?’.

Day 23: The Empty Room (1941) by Charles Morgan

In about 2003, a lady in the village called Marion lent me three books that she thought might set me off on paths of discovery. She knew I liked older books and, being 17, hadn’t formed my taste as an adult yet. The three books were Bulldog Drummond by Sapper, Strong Poison by Dorothy L Sayers, and A Breeze of Morning by Charles Morgan. I liked the Sayers, disliked the Sapper, and really liked the Morgan. Over the years since, I have owned and given away a few Morgan novels, but it’s taken me almost two decades to finally read my second book by him. Which I have in a proof copy – this is what proofs looked like in the 1940s!

Like Sackville-West’s novella, this was written in the midst of war – though Morgan’s is set in the contemporary world, rather than an alterative version of it. Richard is working on the development of a bomb-sight – I had to look up what that was, but essentially something that helps bombs be dropped more accurately. The novella starts with him working alongside other men who are in kept professions, most of whom fought in the previous war.

“I assure you, Flower,” Cannock answered, “this is paradise compared with the last war. And yet, you know, it’s extraordinarily like; that’s the devil of it. People wasting the same time and talking much the same nonsense. The same jokes, the same optimism – it’s like going to a play by a dramatist who may produce an exciting plot but whose style bores you to death. As yet we aren’t half-way through Scene One…”

Morgan is very, very good at describing the experience of finding oneself in the midst of war, and how it affects different people. All the quotes I noted down were about that, I now realise, and it’s particularly impressive to write so vividly about something that, even in 1941, had been described endlessly. Though The Empty Room turns out not really to be about the war – instead, it is about a family Richard meets because of it. There is a fellow worker whom Richard recognises from an earlier acquaintance, who invites him to move in rather than find impersonal barracks. Henry is a widower with a daughter who has not long become an adult. She, Carey, never knew her mother, but there is a portrait of her on the wall showing how similar her daughter looks. Besides this image, little is said of her – though the empty room of the title is Carey’s mothers bedroom, left as a sort of silent shrine to her.

Richard and Carey are about 20 years apart in age, but become close. It’s less icky than it sounds, though perhaps not ick-less. Anyway, it’s another opportunity for Morgan to write so perceptively about the war:

His was a generation different from hers in more than the years that divided them. This was his second war; after it, there would be for him no starting again, only a continuance to the end of a life already doubly broken; but for her it would become an incident of her youth, a point of departure from which her life would stretch ahead, still limitless, still expectant of an ordered fulfilment.

And here’s another example, about the end of the phoney war:

Every good thing became more precious; even things that were, in themselves, neither good not bad – an account-book lying on the table, a packet of old letters in a drawer – became extraordinary because they were inanimate, because they had existed before the break and lay in their places, still unconscious of it. There was a stab of wonder in every carefree movement of a bird, in the stream’s unbroken continuity, in the aloof and unswerving process of Nature.

What starts as a novella about wartime activity turns into a domestic psychological tale – the sort of thing Henry James would write if he could have composed a readable sentence. I did find it weird that such a short book would have the lengthy framing – I think it would have worked equally well, or perhaps better, if Richard had been more quickly introduced to this household. From here, it is a tense and well-written story – what really happened to Carey’s mother, and what is the mystery of the empty room?

Novella a Day in May: Days 20 and 21

StuckinaBook All , , , , , , 4 Comments

There’s a bit of a theme to the two novellas I’ve read in the past two days… or at least their titles.

Year of the Hare, The: Amazon.co.uk: Paasilinna, Arto: 9780720612776: BooksDay 20: The Year of the Hare (1995) by Arto Paasilinna

This novella, translated from Finnish by Herbert Lomas, starts with a journalist and a photographer hitting a hare in their care. The journalist (who is called Vatanen, we later learn) gets out to see if it’s ok.

The journalist picked the leveret up and held it in his arms. It was terrified. He snapped off a piece of twig and splinted its hind leg with strips torn from his handkerchief. The hare nestled its head between its little forepaws, ears trembling with the thumping of its heartbeat.

Tired of waiting, the photographer leaves the journalist in the forest – assuming that he’ll catch up to their hotel. But he doesn’t. Instead, he decides to abscond. He doesn’t like his wife anymore, he doesn’t much like his life, and he sees the opportunity to go off wandering through Finland – with the hare.

From here is a quite episodic novella, featuring all kinds of over the top acts – from bear hunting to dangerous fires, threats of pagan sacrifice and more. I’m going to be honest… it all left me a bit cold. The blurb and puff quotes all talk about how funny it is, but I didn’t really understand the wit. I found it all a little drab – big events but very little to make the reader invest in them. Even the hare is curiously characterless. I suppose it’s a sort of deadpan humour that I have enjoyed in other contexts, but for some reason this one didn’t move me.

Juan Pablo Villalobos's “Down the Rabbit Hole” - Words Without Borders

Day 21: Down the Rabbit Hole (2010) by Juan Pablo Villalobos

Translated from Spanish by Rosalind Harvey, Down the Rabbit Hole comes in around 70 pages – all about a drug gang in Mexico. If I’d known that, I might never have bought it, because I really hate reading about gangs or the Mafia or anything like that. And I’d have missed out on a really brilliant little novella.

It’s told from the perspective of Tochtli, the eight-year-old son of a druglord. This is how it opens…

Some people say say I’m precocious. They say it mainly because they think I know difficult words for a little boy. Some of the difficult words I know are: sordid, disastrous, immaculate, pathetic and devastating. There aren’t really that many people who say I’m precocious. The problem is I don’t know that many people. I know maybe thirteen or fourteen people, and four of them say I’m precocious.

He is indeed pretty precocious, and he does return to those words a lot – particularly sordid and pathetic, which he uses to dismiss a lot of people. (He also uses the f-word a lot, which I rather wish hadn’t been included in this translation.)

Tochtli isn’t shielded from the things happening around them, but he sees them with a child’s incomplete understanding and lack of empathy. He knows that people become corpses at their compound, but is more interested in how many bullets are needed for different parts of the body than thinking about any morality. He is amoral; the people around him are immoral. He is more interested in his various obsessions – Japanese samurai films, a collection of hats, and getting a pygmy hippopotamus from Liberia.

Tochtli’s voice is brilliantly realised in this novella, and Villalobos has created a wholly convincing viewpoint on this horrible world.