Ghosted by Jenn Ashworth

Novels about missing people seem to be a genre in themselves. So many crime novels that I read about (and never read) are about missing children or missing women – massive turn-offs for me, partly because I’ve heard that they tend towards the gruesome, but also because I am fully Team Staunch Book Prize. Which is one of the reasons why I was keen to read Ghosted by Jenn Ashworth (2021 – a new novel!!) – because here it is the man who goes missing. Also it’s a novel by Jenn Ashworth, and I always want to read those.

The narrator is Laurie, a cleaner at a university who has been married to Mark for some time – they initially met at a wedding, where a psychic called Joyce thought they were already a couple. The novel opens with an ordinary scene of the two waking up together – talking about a broken curtain, about staying up too late. Unspokenly considering morning sex, and unspokenly deciding against. Getting up to make a cup of tea.

It’s hard to know how other couples live their lives, but all of this had become utterly ordinary for us. I told the police as much, later. I left for work while he was still in the shower. I don’t know what he was wearing that day. No, he hadn;t seemed unusual in any way that morning. 

The officers – they sent two, a man and a woman who both refused a hot drink and made notes on a tablet instead of in a notebook – seemed frustrated by the fact that no matter how they phrased their questions I had nothing to add – no suspicious or out-of-the-ordinary behaviour on his part – to my account. I didn’t tell them I was pissed off with him, but I am telling you now.

One of the unsettling things about the novel is that we don’t know who’s the ‘you’ that Laurie is speaking to, or even when the ‘now’ is. Mark might not have displayed any out-of-the-ordinary behaviour, but Laurie certainly does. Her emotional reaction to Mark disappearing is subdued. She is speaking directly to us, but holding back from any outburst or breakdown. She doesn’t tell people that Mark has gone missing – whenever his mother Mavis phones, she says he’s in the shower or otherwise unavailable. It’s several weeks before Laurie even contacts the police.

This is nothing as conventional as the unreliable narrator – except inasmuch as every narrator is unreliable. Laurie isn’t really connected with her own thoughts on and responses to this seismic event. Ghosted reminded me often of My Phantom Husband by Marie Darrieussecq. Laurie doesn’t unravel in the same way as that wife-of-a-missing-husband, but there is the same eerie inability to conform to anticipated reactions. Laurie certainly isn’t ignoring Mark’s disappearance, but her thoughts about it always skirt around the conventional. Everything in this novel skirts around the conventional, in fact. There is no desperate hunt to find him – but rather a sort of dispassionate paranoia and anxiety.

I know now the reason I was so reluctant to tell her that Mark had left me was because I feared she would blame me for driving her adored son away. Whatever made idea was currently gripping him and sending him across the country, it would be me that had planted it in his mind. My responsibility, at least, to pluck it out before it could take root. My task, as his lover and wife, to make home a sanctuary and a paradise that he could not bear to leave. If he’d found another woman – someone better groomed, more sympathetic, more likely to store colanders in the correct cupboard – well, he couldn’t be blamed for that. And underneath all that, the fear: once Mavis had decided this was all her fault, she would leave me too.

Mark’s isn’t the only disappearance in the novel. A second plot is Laurie’s relationship with her father, whose mind is gradually disappearing – and also his cleaner-turned-helper Olena, who is closer with him than Laurie is. Ashworth shows the shifting and sad relationship between father and daughter with the same subtle complexity that she does everything, pieced together with memories of the past and anxieties about the future. Other threads are Laurie’s obsession with a young girl who was murdered years earlier, tracking down psychic Joyce, and some money that Olena might have stolen. All are wound together naturally and cleverly, never quite going in the way you expect.

And that’s the brilliance of Ashworth’s writing, I think. Her novels are often unsettling and odd, but every moment is plausible. As soon as it happens, it feels exactly right, even as she resists the natural next steps and anticipated reactions. Overall, Ghosted leans towards the ambiguous and uncertain, but in a way that makes any alternative pathway from her initial premise feel unnatural and stilted. It’s another excellent and consistently interesting success from one of the few still-publishing authors whose books I will always look out for.

I is for Isherwood

This is part of an ongoing series where I write about a different author for each letter of the alphabet. You can see them all here.

‘I’ was always going to be a tricky letter of the alphabet, wasn’t it? A toss up between Isherwood and Ishiguro, neither of whom I’ve read a lot by. But it does mean that I’m not doing my usual thing of forgetting to include some of their books in the picture! I only have five books by Isherwood.

How many books do I have by Christopher Isherwood?

Look, I just said. Five. I don’t even know how many he wrote, but I have decided to stop buying them until I read a few more.

How many of these have I read?

Two – Mr Norris Changes Trains and Prater Violet. I definitely preferred the second of these, largely because I had a wildly different idea of Isherwood in my head than the German sex clubs of Mr Norris Changes Trains, which I thought would be a charming rural tale, for some reason. Fun story: I was reading Mr Norris Changes Trains on a train and, when I got up to get off at my station, discovered that the woman in front of me had also been reading it. I wish I’d said something, but I had to ‘disembark’ (as they put it) before I ended up in the wilds of Devon.

How did I start reading Christopher Isherwood?

I picked up the Folio Mr Norris Changes Trains first, largely because that print is lovely. I don’t have the Folio case for it, so the print is always on display. And he is the sort of author you see a lot in secondhand bookshops, so it has been pretty easy to pick them up cheaply over time.

General impressions…

Difficult to draw any conclusions from two books, of course – especially since I was pretty lukewarm about one, and really liked Prater Violet. He is one of those writers whose life seems to interest people more than his writing now – is that fair? Anyway, I’m keen to read the others I have – but not yet quite keen enough to get to them. Thank goodness they’re short!

From the ones I have, anything particular you’d recommend?

And I think I’ll have more to say about J :D

British Library Women Writers Blog Tour #FarMoreThanFiction

What fun it has been to watch the blog tour for the new British Library Women Writers! There have been wonderful reviews on blogs, YouTube, and Instagram – I recommend visiting the people on the list below to see what they think of Mamma and Tension. Spoilers: all the reviews were positive! The final stop on the tour is chez moi, and a bit about why I suggested these books.

Image

One of the best emails I have ever received was the initial ‘feeler’ from the British Library, wondering what I thought about a series of neglected women writers from the first half of the 20th century, or thereabouts. It was such a delightful opportunity that I did wonder if the email were a hoax, and was half waiting for the venture to take a swerve to requesting my credit card details. To be quite honest, I’d probably have handed them over if it would help get me the series consultant gig.

Suffice to say, nobody was attempting to defraud me – and, a year or so later, I have ended up in the privileged and wonderful position of seeing books I’ve recommended come back onto bookshelves. The response from readers has been just as wonderful to see – whether that’s laughing, feeling comforted, or raging against the ways in which women were treated a hundred years ago. And, of course, sometimes highlighting how little has changed over the years. Perhaps my favourite experience so far is seeing octogenarian readers welcome a book back into print that they had enjoyed with their mothers decades and decades ago.

Choosing the books to recommend is the lifeblood of my role, of course, and I’ve tried to suggest books that cover a wide range of experiences and tones. We didn’t want all the books to be sombre, nor for them all to be frivolous – the aim was some of each, some in between, and some that brilliantly combine the two. And none of the series exemplifies this last category better than Tension by E.M. Delafield, I think.

Delafield is one of the authors in the series who (like Elizabeth von Arnim and Rose Macaulay) is well remembered for some of her work, while lots of it is forgotten. Many readers will know her hilarious Diary of a Provincial Lady and its sequels, not realising quite how prolific Delafield was. Tension was written a decade before that series began – some of the humour is definitely evident. Anybody who has had a brother or sister, or who has seen young siblings together, will recognise the energy, absurdity, and loudness of Ruthie and Ambrose. The adults’ continuing horror at their presence is among the funniest things I’ve read in ages – but Tension is also a brilliant examination of how a woman’s life could (can?) be destroyed by rumours and by the different standards of sexual morality set up for men and women. There are so many wonderful Delafield novels that deserve bringing to a new audience, and perhaps others will follow in the Women Writers series at some point, but this felt like the perfect place to start.

Much less prolific, though equally wonderful, is Diana Tutton. Her funny, chaotic and delightful novel Guard Your Daughters has recently found a new generation of readers – and another facet of her writing is now available in Mamma. Any synopsis of the novel sounds quite scandalous – a woman starts to fall in love with her son-in-law – but the marvellous thing about Mamma is how sensitively and unsensationally Tutton treats the plot. It is such a nuanced, subtle, and even gentle novel – and shows the exceptional control and sensitivity Tutton has. Perhaps the central story doesn’t reflect many women’s lives from the 1950s, but there are plenty of elements about marriage, widowhood, and motherhood that illuminate the experience of different women in the decade.

There are four more titles to come in this series this year, and hopefully many more in years to come. I’m excited for everyone to read the additions that are coming – covering themes as wide-ranging as adoption, singleness, war, and murder. Until those come out, I hope you find plenty to love in Tension, Mamma, and all the myriad titles in the series so far.

A book haul! After all this time!

I haven’t done a proper trip to a secondhand bookshop for such a long time. I did pop into Barter Books in Alnwick last August, but my trip to Regents in Wantage this morning really felt like a step back to normality. It’s less than half an hour away from me, and it’s comfortably the best secondhand bookshop in Oxfordshire. There aren’t many, but this would be a great bookshop anywhere – and, what’s more, has a good turnover. So I came away with an impressive little haul…

The Card by Arnold Bennett

I am slowly adding to my stockpile of Bennett novels, and always enjoying them when I get to them – The Card has been on my horizons ever since Kate reviewed it for Vulpes Libris (which led to me defending Virginia Woolf’s Jacob’s Room passionately in response).

The Cheerful Day by Nan Fairbrother

This is apparently the sequel to a memoir about raising a family in the countryside. In The Cheerful Day, they’ve all moved to London – my heart breaks for them at the thought, but the title and the cover make it sound much happier than I’m imagining!

None-Go-By by Mrs Alfred Sidgwick

I enjoyed Cynthia’s Way by Mrs Sidgwick, so was pleased and a bit surprised to find another book by her. This one is one of her best, according to the doubtless honest description inside – about a couple who move to a small cottage to escape their friends and relations.

The Field of Roses by Phyllis Hastings

I’ve always got an eye out for obscure women writers for the British Library series, and so I’m picking up more or less any early- or mid-century women writer I’ve not heard of. It’s a numbers game!

The Other Bennet Sister by Janice Hadlow

Of the books I found, this was the only one I was expressly looking for – though when I found it, I almost left it on the shelf. I didn’t realise it was quite so very, very long. But I’ve heard good things about it – a novel about Mary Bennet from Pride and Prejudice – so maybe one day I’ll be in the mood for 650 pages.

The Tale of an Empty House and other stories by E.F. Benson

I’ve never read E.F. Benson’s ghost stories, though have heard them mentioned a lot. To be honest, I seldom read ghost stories cos I’m a huge coward – and I don’t even believe in ghosts, so I’m not sure what I’m scared about – but now I have the opportunity, at least.

The Doctor’s Wife by Brian Moore

This sounds a bit closer to The Lonely Passion of Judith Hearne than the most recent Moore I read – and it is his centenary year, after all.

Sprig Muslin by Georgette Heyer

Since I’m the latest convert to the altar of Ms Heyer, I was pretty confident I’d find something in the shop to keep going. I can’t remember if this is one of the books that people recommended here or on Twitter, but I didn’t recognise any of the other titles in the pile on their ‘women’s writing’ shelves. Not quite sure what qualifies books to get onto that single bookcase, but curiously the first book on it was Things Fall Apart by Chinua Achebe…

April Lady by Georgette Heyer

Complete & Unabridged (April Lady): Amazon.co.uk: Heyer, Georgette,  Matheson, Eve: 9780745166322: BooksWhenever Karen and I run a ‘club’ year, somebody reads a Georgette Heyer novel. I don’t know how many she wrote, but my guess would be thousands. And every time I say ‘How on earth have I not yet read anything by Heyer?’

I think it’s partly because of the historical fiction angle, and partly because the name ‘Georgette’ is so odd. It’s certainly not for lack of trust in the legions of people who love her. And, you know what, all those people were right. I still haven’t actually read a physical Heyer novel, but I spent the Bank Holiday weekend stuck on the motorway, listening to an audiobook of April Lady read by Eve Matheson.

April Lady was published in 1957, which places it somewhere in the second half of Heyer’s writing career – it’s one of her Regency novels, and I finished it without having any idea what the title refers to. The main characters are Nell Cardross and her husband, the Earl of Cardross, or Giles. She is young and beautiful, from a relatively unwealthy family, and I do stress the word ‘relatively’. Cardross, on the other hand, has money all over the place – but wants to make sure his wife isn’t too profligate with spending, and doesn’t hide bills from him. This is the gist of the opening scene and, indeed, the entire plot.

There is a curious sort of ‘Gift of the Magi’ theme to the central couple: neither knows how much the other loves them. Giles thinks Nell married him for his money; Nell thinks Giles married her for her looks, and for convenience. Nell’s mother – described as having ‘more hair than wit’ – has told Nell to stay undemonstrative, so as not to annoy her husband, and not to question any extra-marital dalliances he might have.

For her part, Nell discovers an unpaid dressmakers bill for £300. She doesn’t think she can take it to her husband – because she fears his anger, but mostly because she fears it will confirm his belief that she is mercenary.

And so much of April Lady is Nell’s attempts to get her hands on the money without Giles knowing – and without taking the advice of her exuberant, funny, and mildly immoral brother Dysart. (His suggestions include selling her marital jewellery and making fakes, ordering more dresses to keep the dressmaker busy, and even dabbling as a highwayman.)

As I listened, I expected this to be the opening scene to a much more complex plot – but this is what sustains the whole novel. There is a parallel plot with Cardross’s sister Letty. who reminded me a lot of Lydia Bennet with her impetuousness and high drama – she is yearning to marry Mr Allendale before he heads to Brazil, but needs her brother’s permission. These two plots cleverly overlap, but Heyer is brilliant at sustaining this central motivation throughout April Lady, without flagging.

My favourite thing about the novel is how delightful all the characters are. Nell is perhaps a little too straitlaced to be truly entertaining, but I adored her wastrel brother, her impulsive sister-in-law, and her witty, calm husband. He might be the villain of the piece in another writer’s hands, but he reminded me of a kinder Mr Bennet – teasing people, especially his sister, while implacable in his own choices.

And, gosh, this novel is funny. I laughed a lot in the car – my favourite bit being a friend of Letty’s who has rehearsed various dramatic speeches about never giving away Letty’s secret plan, only nobody else seems to give her cues or react as she would like.

Ultimately, of course, all ends well and everything is explained – but not before some misunderstandings and complications come along. I genuinely cared about the happiness of these characters, though never felt a moment’s anxiety that the happy ending might not come.

I’ve used two Austen comparisons already, and I think any comparisons that have been made between Heyer and Austen are justified – at least to an extent. Heyer’s plot is not as keenly plotted as Austen’s, nor her characters in April Lady quite as immortal, but it was a truly wonderful read that exceeded my fairly high expectations. My first Heyer, but definitely not my last.

British Library Women Writers #8: Tension by E.M. Delafield

Tension by E. M. Delafield, Simon Thomas | WaterstonesIf you click on the tag above, you’ll be able to see my posts about all the British Library Women Writers books as they come out – or, more often, some time after they come out. But Tension by E.M. Delafield only came out a couple of weeks ago – and I’m delighted, as Delafield was definitely one of the authors I was really hoping would get onto the list. But when she wrote so many books, so many of which aren’t in print (or are only POD and ebook), how would I choose?

I’m hoping this won’t be the last EMD title in the series, but I chose Tension for the simple reason that I think it’s one of her best – and I’ve read about 30 of her books now. Apparently I read it in 2004, but I didn’t remember anything about it and loved my re-read for the 1920 Club about a year ago. I’m recycling much of that review here.

The main characters are Lady Rossiter and Sir Julian Rossiter, and when Delafield created them I suspect she had half an eye on Mr and Mrs Bennet from Pride and Prejudice. They have very little fondness for each other, though Sir Julian usually restricts himself to silently laughing at Lady Rossiter’s nonsensical sayings and gossip. Where she differs from Mrs Bennet is that Lady R is also hypocritical and a little cruel – though she would always see it as doing her duty. That is one of the main tensions of Tension.

But all starts off very amusingly – here’s the opening of the novel:

“Auntie Iris has written a book!”

“A book!” echoed both auditors of the announcement, in keys varying between astonishment and dismay.

“Yes, and it’s going to be published, and put into a blue cover, and sold, and Auntie Iris is going to make heaps and heaps of money!”

“What is it to be called?” said Lady Rossiter rather gloomily, fixing an apprehensive eye on the exuberant niece of the authoress.

“It’s called ‘Why, Ben!’ and it’s a Story of the Sexes,” glibly quoted the young lady, unaware of the shock inflicted by this brazen announcement, delivered at the top of her squeaky, nine-year-old voice.

Could there be a better fake title than Why, Ben! – I love it, and all the comedy around how horrified everyone is by the idea of this book is glorious. Delafield might also have Austen in mind with her style in this novel – she does lots of sentences with the balance and irony of an Austen sentence, laughing at everyone involved and never saying quite everything – leaving the reader to fill in the gaps and thus feel on the side of the author.

The children (whom the Rossiters unite in loathing, though Lady R would not admit it openly) are neighbours, and the offspring of harassed, jovial Mark. Their mother is (whisper it) a ‘dypsomaniac’, shut away but very much not dead. And that is why Lady Rossiter takes an officious concern when a young woman moves to the area and starts working with Mark – because, surely, it is the same Miss Marchrose who once broke off an engagement when her fiance became disabled…

Delafield often enjoys poking fun at people who ‘Don’t want to gossip, but…’ – and sometimes she shows the dark side of it too. Tension is always an extremely funny book, particularly if you like dry, character-based, and dialogue-heavy comedy (which I definitely do), but it gets darker as it goes on. Lady Rossiter is ruthlessly determined to ruin Miss Marchrose, all in the name of protecting those around her and not wanting to gossip. She never does anything outright. She just quietly and subtly makes the situation impossible for Miss Marchrose. And Delafield is so clever at not making Lady Rossiter a deceitful character – she genuinely does believe she is doing what is right, and has an answer for every exasperated accusation Sir Julian makes. Which isn’t that many, because he follows the path of least resistance.

Delafield is brilliant when she unites comedy and tragedy, and I think Tension is one of her best books. It’s certainly stylised, but it’s a style I loved.

And I think it makes such a great addition to the Women Writers series because it is so centred on how rumours and reputation devastatingly affect women – whether the rumours are founded or not – while men are scarcely impacted. By making a woman the nemesis too, Delafield resists a black and white reading of who hurts whom – though arguably Lady Rossiter is as much a product of a patriarchal society as anybody else.

My sweet spot is books that are funny AND poignant, and this is up there with earlier British Library Women Writers titles Father by Elizabeth von Arnim and Dangerous Ages by Rose Macaulay in doing just that.

The Butterfly Lampshade by Aimee Bender

The Butterfly Lampshade by Aimee BenderMy dear friend Lorna got me The Butterfly Lampshade (2020) for my birthday last year, after the bookseller in Kramer Books, Washington DC, told her it was similar to our beloved Marilynne Robinson. Having finished it, I am not sure that is true – but the novel is nevertheless excellent, and I can sort of see where he/she was coming from…

The novel is about Francie – looking back on her childhood as someone in her late 20s. Her mother has had repeated psychotic episodes, and the last of these means she cannot care for Francie anymore. On that particular night, Francie is eight and has started staying with a babysitter as she prepares to travel to Los Angeles to stay with an aunt and uncle and their new child. In the midst of an episode, Francie’s mum has told her that there is a bug inside her.

But it turned out that my mother was right about the bug. She was several days too early, and mine had not been crawling, but there would end up being a bug in me after all, just a few days after she checked into the hospital, my fated bug, a butterfly I’d found at the babysitter’s apartment, floating like a red and gold leaf so prettily on the top of a tall glass of water. I did not have any other way to hold on to it, and I could not possibly leave it in the babysitter’s apartment, and the only contained handy was myself. Time was short. I drank it down because I had to.

This butterfly exactly matches the one on the titular lampshade – and this is the first of three instances of something emerging from its background. Though Francie never sees the moment at which the thing emerges from 2D to 3D, and nobody else ever sees the aftermath. There is the butterfly from the pattern of butterflies on a lampshade, the beetle from the picture of a beetle, and roses that have fallen out of a curtain patterned with roses. As the narrator looking back, Francie often lists these three events together as a sort of mantra – the lampshade, beetle, and roses are an iterative pattern long before we hear about the second and third events in detail. Initially, indeed, I thought I’d somehow missed these events being described. That’s just one of the ways that Bender’s narrative disconcerts the reader. She doesn’t give us all the information, or let us settle in one spot for too long.

In the present, Francie makes her living by buying objects at garage sales, cleaning them up, and selling them online. It sounds like one of those careers that people only have in sitcoms, but that sort of suits the uneasy relationship with reality that The Butterfly Lampshade has. The novel is not going to come out on either side of the ‘is this really happening?’ debate, when it comes to butterflies, beetles, and roses. It feels like that is somehow the least interesting question to ask. Instead, it asks questions like why does Francie fixate on it so much, or what does it mean about her relationship with her mother.

Francie is still in touch with her mother – mostly by phone, but sometimes in person. Her aunt and cousin have become more like mother and sister – just another way in which truth and fiction are intertwining entities. The same thing comes through in Bender’s writing, casually laden with metaphors and other imagery. I love this idea of ‘bumped around our sentences’ here:

It was awkward without my aunt there; we bumped around our sentences as if we’d just met, and when my mother asked again about the flight I told her every detail I could think of, hanging on to the tiny pieces of information like they were stepping-stones between us, which they were, including telling her my drink choice, and information about my seat companion, and how long I had waited for the bus (twenty minutes) while she listened with her large and hungry eyes.

For a novel with a fantastic premise, The Butterfly Lampshade is not really interested in plot. It is a slow-paced, thoughtful, and moving examination of family relationships and mental illness – as well as how memory does or doesn’t work, and how we form our own senses of identity.

In fact, the more I describe it, the more I can see what the bookseller was saying. While the writing style is nothing like Robinson’s, it suits similar reading moods – where you want something to read slowly and almost meditatively, to explore the depths and details of human relationships. It was a very good book – and I can sense that it would be even better a second time around.

StuckinaBook’s Weekend Miscellany

It’s been a while since I did one of these miscellanies, I think. In the UK, pandemic restrictions start to lift in a couple of days, so it’s quite an exciting feeling – on the edge of being able to go inside friends’ homes and hug them etc! (My least favourite kind of tweet is the “Weren’t we all doing this anyway?” variety. No, most of us were doing all we could to stop the spread of the virus.) Of course, we shan’t all be dashing back to normal life on Monday, but this weekend does feel like the end of something.

I’m still waiting for my first vaccination, though it should only be a few weeks now. And hoping my current spate of dizziness/eye soreness goes away – it’s now a year since all my health stuff started, and I’m no closer to a diagnosis, but generally it is all very, very slowly improving. Praise God, there were only a couple weeks where I couldn’t read at all – at the moment, I just have to steer clear of small print.

ANYWAY, that’s a whistle-stop update. Let’s get onto the book, the blog post, and the link:

1.) The blog post – It’s a vlog post, but I wanted to share a review of O, The Brave Music from Lil’s Vintage World – one of my favourite Booktubers. I so love seeing people discover this book, particularly, from all the British Library Women Writers series.

2.) The link – On Twitter, Marina Sofia shared an excellent article by Alexander Larman in The Critic: ‘A Radical Proposal: Book reviews should review books‘. It has always irked me that broadsheet reviews, especially of non-fiction, scarcely engage with the quality of the book in question. One of the many reasons I prefer reading bloggers – though the bloggers vs newspaper reviewers debate has died down a little of late, hasn’t it?

3.) The book – One of the few still-publishing novelists I love is Jenn Ashworth. I still have a couple of her back catalogue unread on my shelves, but that doesn’t stop me being excited about Ghosted, coming out in June. Find out more at Jenn’s website.

Not After Midnight and Other Stories by Daphne du Maurier – #DDMReadingWeek

I’ve read quite a few of Daphne du Maurier’s novels, but I don’t think I’d previously read any of her short stories – some of which are, of course, very famous from the film adaptations that were made of them. Last year I was toying between reading Not After Midnight and Other Stories and Don’t Look Now and other stories – both of which I owned – before I opened them and discovered they were the same collection under different names. One went to a charity shop and I read neither – but now I’ve finally read it.

In this collection, Daphne du Maurier’s tackles what I think is the hardest form: the long short story. I’m not usually a fan of short stories that go beyond 20 or so pages, because it feels like they are wasting the unique attributes of the form. But in Not After Midnight, du Maurier writes five long short stories – and I may as well take them in turn.

Don’t Look Now

The famous one! I’ve never seen the film, but I’m certainly aware of it – but we’ll be considering the story, of course. It opens:

“Don’t look now,” John said to this wife, “but there are a couple of old girls two tables away who are trying to hypnotise me.”

It’s a good start. John and Laura are on holiday in Venice, grieving the loss of their young daughter Christine – she has recently died of meningitis. The holiday is marred a little by news of seemingly random murders – somebody is roaming the streets with a knife. The couple get talking to this ‘couple of old girls’, one of whom tells John that he has second sight. When he sees a small girl wearing a pixie hood running in fear down a street, the lady tells him that Christine is trying to warn of danger in Venice.

When their son is taken ill at school, Laura flies home. John is going to drive home, but a mysterious incident makes him remain – and leads to a very dramatic and spooky ending.

This is an excellent story, deservedly renowned for its tension and creepiness, as well as a very good depiction of a British holiday in Italy. My main reservation with it is that du Maurier seems to think grieving a dead child is something only a mother would do. John tends to his wife, but doesn’t seem particularly bothered that Christine has died. But, that detail aside, a marvellous story.

Not After Midnight

Timothy Grey is a schoolteacher on holiday on Crete, suffering from some unspecified illness – possibly a nervous breakdown. He demands a chalet near the sea, because he intends to paint – the hotel staff are reluctant, because somebody staying there recently died…

The other notable guests are the Stolls – Mr Stoll is rude, loud, and drunk; his wife is silent and possibly deaf.

The title of this story is excellent, and for much of it du Maurier sustains the same tension and intrigue as ‘Don’t Look Now’ – but I found the ending rather unsatisfying and quite plebian.

A Border-Line Case

Shelagh is an aspiring actor who finds impelled to go off to Ireland to find a man called Nick, once close friends with her father. On her father’s deathbed, he has reminisced about Nick – and, in his dying moment, looks at Shelagh with fear and horror. Shelagh hopes for answers, or at least some attempt of posthumous reconciliation, by finding Nick. But when she identifies where he lives, she is ambushed and kidnapped by Nick’s accomplices, and forced to stay on his island.

Rather unsettlingly, they start that of charming, flirty conversation that sometimes happens between kidnappers and kidnappees in films, and presumably never in real life. This isn’t Stockholm Syndrome; it is instant.

There are a couple of revelatory twists in this story – one of which is to do with contemporary politics, and one of which is pretty horrifying. More something from Greek myth than life. Anyway, this was another story that started really interestingly and couldn’t sustain that intrigue satisfactorily, in my opinion.

The Way of the Cross

The only story in the collection without any sort of horror element, this is another tale of Brits abroad – in this case, Jerusalem. A group led by a stand-in vicar are touring the Holy Land, each with their own anxieties and reasons for being there. Perhaps the most memorable of the group is nine-year-old Robin – the only person there who seems to have read the gospels – who leads them in a chaotic attempt to find the Garden of Gethsemane.

This is a really good and unusual story, though one that doesn’t fit the feel of the collection at all. It is quite poignant, as the group face humiliations and failures – realising the trip is not the once-in-a-lifetime experience they’d hoped for, and finding out things about themselves and others that they’d rather not know. As I say, this isn’t horror – there is nothing creepy about it – but there is an underlying sense of lives being sadly changed, which is perhaps more horrifying than the jump scares of the earlier stories.

The Breakthrough

Some sci-fi thing about capturing essences that I didn’t enjoy at all, but that’s probably because I find sci-fi rather tedious at the best of times.

Ok, overall rather a mixed reception from me. ‘Don’t Look Now’ is brilliant, and ‘The Way of the Cross’ is great in a very different way. The other stories are largely readable, but all could have done with some rethinking and editing. Du Maurier is exceptional at premises and settings, but doesn’t always know how to keep those things going for the length of a long short story.

Should offensive books be republished?

When I reviewed Miss Linsey and Pa by Stella Gibbons earlier in the year, I said that it was one of my favourite reads of 2021 so far – but that I couldn’t recommend it to the British Library for republishing, because there are racist elements to it that couldn’t easily be excised. They weren’t the main gist of the novel, by any means, and some of the antisemitism could probably be neatly cut away – but there is one secondary character whose racism towards another secondary character is tangled up in the plot.

I mentioned in that review that I might try to write more about the ethics of reprinting racist and other discriminatory works from the past, and a couple of people said they’d be interested in that discussion – and quite a few people said they thought any novel from the past should be eligible to be reprinted, with caveats in an introduction if necessary.

I want to give my own two caveats at the beginning: firstly, I am a white man and thus certainly not the person to be talking about how racism and sexism affect individuals, and I won’t be trying to do that today. If this becomes mansplaining or whitesplaining, please shout me down. Secondly, I think we should all have an awareness that there are opinions we all unthinkingly hold today that will be considered appalling by future generations. We don’t know what those opinions are, and that’s kind of the point.

Books that have been turned down

This hasn’t been something I’ve had to think about until relatively recently – in my very privileged position of being able to recommend books for the British Library Women Writers series. I emphasise that I am recommending rather than deciding, and they can say (and have said) no to my suggestions. (A third caveat: I am, of course, speaking for myself in this post – not for the British Library.)

They’ve turned down books for several reasons. Some simply didn’t fit the criteria of the series – I really wanted to include an Ivy Compton-Burnett, but all her novels are set in some fanciful past, and so don’t comment on life for women of the decade they’re published. I tried to emphasise the ‘fictionalised’ half of ‘fictionalised autobiography” for Our Hearts Were Young and Gay by Corneila Otis Skinner and Emily Kimbrough, deep down knowing it was really just autobiography. One novel the editor at the British Library simply didn’t like, which is fair enough. Another novel was really promising throughout, but had a bad, confusing, and sudden ending – and we agreed that, sadly, this ruled it out. And a final novel couldn’t be used because of an aspect of it that, while not overt racism, would be uncomfortable to read. It’s by an author who has recently been republished by more than one reprint publisher – but, notably, they haven’t included this particular book of hers either.

That’s not a bad batting average, considering how many of my recommendations have been accepted and are coming out in the future – and, of course, that’s why the editor is there (and she’s wonderful). But it’s that last one that particularly ties into the question of ‘should we reprint questionable books’.

Argument 1: We shouldn’t erase the past

A lot of people come from the position that the past is the past, and we shouldn’t try to doctor it to make it palatable for modern eyes. And this is largely what happens when books are reprinted. I know that sometimes offensive words are changed (the reprint of O, The Brave Music takes out an n-word, for instance, without changing the overall meaning of the scene), but broadly the world of Bowdlerised editions is a thing of the past. I don’t know how long that will last – Bowdler and his ilk changed things to make them fit with the morals and sensitivities of his age, and I can envisage 2021 doing the same. But it hasn’t happened yet.

I am generally pro the idea of not editing the past – whether that is from prudery or from being woke (and I don’t use the term disparagingly). But sometimes that means not publishing at all.

Argument 2: The past can still hurt people

BUT not wanting to erase the past isn’t the same as insisting that it is glorified and sustained. We’ve seen that recently with statues. It seems a farcical argument to me that we shouldn’t remove statues because that is destroying history – as though the only way that we have ever learned about the past is by reading statues.

I am firmly against destroying existing books – burning books has never been a good look for any movement – but that’s not to say the content is innocuous. Again, I am keen not to Whitesplain, so I will just say this: racism in books makes me feel uncomfortable and unhappy, but it doesn’t chime with racism I have personally faced – which is, of course, none. I cannot speak for people who read (say) the n-word in a novel and have to re-live all the times they’ve had that word used at them. But it’s worth remembering that books from the past still have the power to cause pain to readers in the present.

Argument 3: Publishing is a commercial venture

Acknowledging this pain – if a book shouldn’t be extensively edited to fit modern views (and I think it shouldn’t) then what next?

Many argue that books should just come out as is, and there are certain authors who are treated just like that. Joseph Conrad has a novel with the n-word in the title and, as far as I know, it’s still republished with that title. It certainly was in the English faculty under that title when I studied there, though perhaps it’s just called Narcissus now. Anyway, I shan’t be reading any more Conrad because I find him deathly dull, but there is certainly an echelon of writers who are so canonical that publishers have to make decisions about how they present them. There are words, themes, and perspectives in Wuthering HeightsTo Kill a MockingbirdOthello, and any number of other classic texts that wouldn’t be published as new books now – but these authors and books are too renowned to ignore.

The same is not true of reprint publishing. I think Miss Linsey and Pa is largely brilliant, but the cultural world will not notice if it never comes back into print. And publishers will only reprint a book if they think it will sell, and won’t damage their reputation or open them up to legal battles. These are all different variables, of course. But if you say ‘We should bring back books as they are’, you are also saying ‘This publisher should take a commercial and reputational risk on this product’. And, honestly, why should they?

Conclusion: it’s a moral and practical decision…

It’s not a surprising conclusion, but I do think the commercial/practical element is surprisingly often left out of conversations on this topic. Whatever my opinion of reprinting a book is, the ultimate opinion that matters is people with the capital and sway to bring a book back into print. I personally believe we shouldn’t reprint books that will damage others (and I am not qualified, as a white man, to determine what those things are – listening is always key), and that we shouldn’t extensively edit books to make them fit our sensibilities (though I think removing the odd word is fine), but my opinion is pretty meaningless on its own because nobody is asking me to put my money and name on the line.

And, again, it’s always worth remembering – lest we feel the temptation to be self-righteous against past writers and readers – that there are plenty of novels coming out at the moment that will be considered anathema to a future generation.

This post has felt rather a ramble, but hopefully some of it makes sense! I would love to know your thoughts on the topic…