Talk of the Devil by Frank Baker – #1956club

book cover of Talk of the DevilAnother book that’s been on my shelves for at least 15 years is Talk of the Devil by Frank Baker [image on left from Fantastic Fiction]. It’s no secret that his earlier novel Miss Hargreaves is all all-time best-beloved book, but I’ve had mixed-to-negative reactions to all the other novels I’ve read by him. Will Talk of the Devil be any different?

Spoilers: not really. But let’s keep on.

The narrator, Philip, has headed to Cornwall, an area that Baker particularly loved, to visit a couple of old friends – Paul Acton and Jeremy Holden. And Baker is good on descriptions of Cornwall – here’s what he says about St Zenac, which isn’t a real place but is a wonderfully Cornish name:

‘It is a place so much on the edge of unreality, you can never decide where myth ends and history begins. Wild moorland, with massive stacks of granite clutched by lichen; streams that trickle secretly to the sea; the raven, the buzzard, the viper; and in little ravines, soft mounds of sweet turf where bladder-campion and thrift grow in rich masses. It is a country too ancient to be safe. The few farming people, in wind-swept stone cottages, are a troglodyte race, stunted in growth, with thick burry voices. Antiquarians, geologists, archaeologists, and novelists – all have written about this last edge of England, once called Bolerium. And those who have come under the spell of it invariably have to return to it; to return to the last sweeping fire of the falling sun as it sinks beyond the Atlantic, the death of day in England.’

I think Baker is at his best in Talk of the Devil when writing about Cornwall – the landscape and also the feelings it evokes. This is very near the beginning of the book, and I was filled with hope. But…

The actual plot of Talk of the Devil is rather more confusing. While Philip is visiting, he hears about the death of Gladys Acton – which many locals believe was the result of dark supernatural forces, though officially she died of natural causes.

”Because she was murdered in such a way that there could never be any evidence. Because, in fact, she was murdered by the power of malicious thought, bent upon her end. And shall I tell you why I’m so interested, Jeremy? Because people can be, and are being destroyed without any material force being employed. You don’t need guns in this game. Simply the collective power of evil. And especially for unfortunate people like Gladys Acton, who have enough integrity and determination to get in the way.”

The above is the sort of conversation a lot of people have, and Philip spends quite a lot of the novel trying to establish the nature of evil, and determine whether or not there is such a person as the devil.

Baker often looks to the metaphysical in his books. In Miss Hargreaves, a significant element of the novel explores the power of creative thought – being sufficient to make a fictional person come alive. It works there, because it is an undercurrent to a very funny and enjoyable narrative, and it is attached to a very concrete example. In Talk of the Devil, as elsewhere in his other novels, Baker gets too tangled up in philosophical and metaphysical conversations without enough surface story to make them compelling.

I found myself quite confused by Talk of the Devil. It was enjoyable enough to read, but it hovered between a rather flimsy thriller and something with more sophisticated, but more baffling, aims. Putting together a treatise on the nature of evil with a murder mystery sounds quite promising, but the tangle didn’t ever really become disentangled.

If this were the first novel I’d read by Baker, I’d probably give it a lukewarm appreciation. It’s certainly not poorly written on a prose level, even if the construction isn’t wonderful. But I start each Baker novel with the hope that, finally, I might have found a worthy successor to the wondrous Miss Hargreaves. Maybe after 15 years I have to acknowledge that lightning struck once. But more likely, I’ll keep slowly reading his books, hoping for that second miracle.

Tea at Four O’Clock by Janet McNeill – #1956Club

One of the reasons I love these club years is that it makes me delve into the books that have sat on my shelves for donkey’s years. I bought Tea at Four O’Clock by Janet McNeill in 2005, and it has sat quietly waiting for a long time. I even read a couple of her other novels when Turnpike Press republished them (they’ve also done this one), and I enjoyed them though I wasn’t blown away by them. Not in the way that I was by Tea at Four O’Clock. It’s brilliant.

As the novel opens, Laura Percival is returning from the funeral of her sister Mildred. They have lived all their lives in a very large house (‘Marathon’) in Northern Ireland, now neither parent is alive, and for the past six years Laura has been looking after Mildred. As she walks home from the funeral, the words of the priest are going around in her head: ‘the sister who with exemplary devotion did not spare herself in the long months of nursing’. It is the only tribute she has received for these years of service. Now that Mildred has finally died, Laura has agency – and for the first time in her life.

We learn that, even before this sickness, Mildred dominated Laura’s life with a well-intentioned but draconian insistence on routine. And on respectability above all else. It’s that rigorous routine and respectability that Laura finds hard to escape in the days after Mildred’s death – she has left such an imprint on Marathon that it is unthinkable to do anything but obey her. This is what George sees when he returns – the wastrel brother who has been estranged from the family for decades. The quote below is where the novel’s title comes from. (Miss Parks is a friend of Mildred’s who came to visit and then moved in, and is clearly hoping to be asked to remain.)

“It’s a good many years,” he said, a little uncertainly, “since I heard that clock.”

Miss Parks was quick to emphasise her more intimate acquaintance with it. “Four o’clock! That’s always been a very special time with us. Mildred rested in the afternoon, you see, and Laura brought her tea-tray in at four o’clock. Mildred did like regular habits, you know. It’s a great help to an invalid, and Laura understood that so well. Do you know, Mr Percival, I’ve seen Laura waiting outside the door in the hall, with the tray in her hand, and the minute the clock had finished striking she would knock and come in. ‘Mildred,’ she would say, ‘Mildred dear, it’s four o’clock.'”

George could suddenly bear no more of it. He could see Laura standing there waiting, the tea-tray with all its appointments of lace and china and silver correctly placed for the personal satisfaction of one querulous invalid. He could imagine Laura’s hand, a small hand, never very clever at anything except the delicate brushwork of her paintings, poised ready to knock when the sound of the clock had sunk to silence. Then the hesitant rap and the opening door, and Mildred on the sofa turning her ailing body to feed on Laura’s apparent health. He felt sick and turned to the sofa to reassure himself it was indeed empty. “I’m going out into the garden,” he said, “for a smoke,” and fumbling his way through the blinds he opened the french windows and went out onto the lawn.

Hopefully that’s given a sense of how good McNeill’s prose is in this novel. She is also so good at the nuances of how Laura is reacting now – some relief, some guilt, some helplessness, some uncertainty. She doesn’t want to switch her dependency from the dead sister to the newly returned brother, but nor does she know what to do with independence. Each of the interlocking characters, dead and alive, is drawn so subtly and cleverly.

We also see the lost chances of the past – and the different paths for the future. George has affection for this sister, but also a plan to get him, his wife and child out of relative poorness (his wife is a wonderful and wise character). It’s hard not to sympathise with all of the characters. Even those whose motives are initially suspect grow more forgivable as we understand them more.

It’s a beautiful and brilliant novel, and I’m so glad I finally got it off the shelf.

#1956Club – ready, set, go!

The 1956 Club starts tomorrow – this is the place to leave your review links, or feel free to put your review in the comments if you don’t write reviews anywhere.

For the uninitiated – every six months, Karen and I ask everyone to read books published in the same year, and together we compile a portrait of the year. All types of books welcome; all languages welcome. Make your own rules if you’re in doubt.

Can’t wait to see what everyone reads – it already looks like it’s going to be an absolutely stellar year.

My Dog Tulip by J.R. Ackerley

Madame Bibi Lophile

Spam Tomorrow by Verily Anderson

The Captive Reader
Stuck in a Book

The Naked Sun by Isaac Asimov

Harriet Devine

Talk of the Devil by Frank Baker

Stuck in a Book

Giovanni’s Room by James Baldwin

Kinship of All Species
Book Around the Corner
Madame Bibi Lophile

A Legacy by Sybille Bedford

Alexander Pamment

Zama by Antonio de Benedetto

1streading’s Blog

Italian Folktales by Italo Calvino

Gallimaufry Book Studio

The Fall by Albert Camus

Kaggsy’s Bookish Ramblings
What Me Read

The Chase by Alejo Carpentier

1streading’s Blog

Marching with April by Hugo Charteris

Kaggsy’s Bookish Ramblings

Dead Man’s Folly by Agatha Christie

Hopewell’s Library of Life
Kaggsy’s Bookish Ramblings
Booker Talk

Fifteen by Beverly Cleary

Staircase Wit

Journals of Jean Cocteau

Kaggsy’s Bookish Ramblings

The Man Who Japed by Philip K. Dick

Pining for the West

Minority Report by Philip K. Dick

Annabookbel

A Dangerous Game by Friedrich Durrenmatt

1st Readings

Five A.M. by Jean Dutourd

Neglected Books

Knight’s Castle by Edward Eager

Staircase Wit

Every Eye by Isobel English

Karen’s Books and Chocolate
She Reads Novels

We Made a Garden by Margery Fish

The Captive Reader

Diamond are Forever by Ian Fleming

Mr Kaggsy

Gentlemen at Gyang Gyang by Miles Franklin

Brona’s Books

Thieves and Rascals by Mavis Gallant

JacquiWine’s Journal

Les Racines du ciel by Romain Gary

Finding Time to Write

The Miracle Worker by William Gibson

Becky’s Book Reviews

Howl and other poems by Allen Ginsberg

Kaggsy’s Bookish Ramblings

An Episode of Sparrows by Rumer Godden

Harriet Devine

Down There by David Goodis

Paul Lajoie

The Last Resort by Pamela Hansford Johnson

HeavenAli

Sprig Muslin by Georgette Heyer

What Me Read
Desperate Reader
The Captive Reader

The Sybil by Par Lagerkvist

1streading’s Blog

Miss Hogg and the Bronte Murders by Austin Lee

Desperate Reader

Rasmus and the Vagabond by Astrid Lindgren

I Read That in a Book

Mio, My Son by Astrid Lindgren

Sally Tarbox

Voyage into Violence by Frances and Richard Lockridge

Bitter Tea and Mystery

The Towers of Trebizond by Rose Macaulay

Bookword
What Me Read
Dovegreyreader

Thin Ice by Compton Mackenzie

Stuck in a Book

Palace Walk by Naguib Mahfouz

What Me Read

Cop Hater by Ed McBain

Kaggsy’s Bookish Ramblings
Typings

Tea at Four O’Clock by Janet McNeill

Stuck in a Book
746Books

A Devil in Paradise by Henry Miller

Intermittencies of the Mind

The Last Hurrah by Edwin O’Connor

Staircase Wit

A Family Party by John O’Hara

Hopewell’s Public Library of Life

Houseboy by Ferdinand Oyono

Winston’s Dad

The Diehard by Jean Potts

A Hot Cup of Pleasure

The Brazen Head by John Cowper Powys

Intermittencies of the Mind

Mrs. Pepperpot by Alf Prøysen

Finding Time to Write
I Read That in a Book

The Wings of the Night by Thomas H. Raddall

Consumed by Ink

A Certain Smile by Francoise Sagan

746Books

The Lonely Londoners by Sam Selvon

Adventures in reading, running and working from home
Annabookbel
Bookish Beck

The Silver Sword by Ian Serraillier

Finding Time to Write
Bookword

Train to Pakistan by Khushwant Singh

LouLou Reads

Beyond the Gates by Dorothy Evelyn Smith

Stuck in a Book

Wildfire at Midnight by Mary Stewart

Scones and Chaise Longues

A Haunted Land by Randolph Stow

ANZ Lit Lovers

The Key by Jun’ichirō Tanizaki

Winstonsdad’s Blog

The Keys of My Prison by Frances Shelley Wees

Bitter Tea and Mystery

Captain of Dragoons by Ronald Welch

I Read That in a Book

Night by Elie Wiesel

Bookish Beck

French Leave by P.G. Wodehouse

Karen’s Books and Chocolate

The Children Who Stayed Alone by Bonnie Bess Worline

The Captive Reader

Harry the Dirty Dog by Gene Zion

Staircase Wit

 

A 1956 Club game from Josie Holford!

Family Skeletons by Henrietta Garnett

I bought Family Skeletons (1986) in 2011, shortly after seeing Henrietta Garnett give a talk about her life at a bookshop in Oxford. It was a fun evening, not just because her life is interesting but because she was quite clearly several drinks past sober throughout. My main memory is that she continually took glasses off and put them back on, holding the notes from which she was reading at great distances each time. It was a continue whirl of outstretched arm and the other spiralling her glasses on and off.

Anyway, it interested me enough that I wanted to read her novel. And I was interested before any of this happens, because she is from a literary an artistic dynasty – being the daughter of David Garnett and the granddaughter of Vanessa Bell. With such heritage, one could hardly avoid writing a book. Despite the title of this one, it is not a roman à clef.

Catherine is the heroine in this one – a young and naive woman, just turned adult, who has lived a sheltered life in a beautiful Irish estate called Malabay. Only her eccentric uncle Pake lives with her, excepting some staff. He has given her a love of literature and nature, but doesn’t like her to travel far from Malabay and admits few visitors.

Tara – a man; have men ever been called this? – is allowed in as a cousin, but these family ties don’t stop Tara and Catherine falling in love, against Pake’s better judgement. He is older and less innocent than Catherine, and he is amused by her total lack of understanding of the world. It is a passionate and unwise relationship, and one that Garnett describes with sort of language and images you can easily imagine a Bloomsbury Group member using.

Once, she woke during the night, frightened by the half-forgotten image of a dream already scudding out of her head. She had been transformed into a hare and was being pursued by dogs. The dogs were not far behind her and she could smell their dreadful hot breath. Her soul was still her own, but the dogs were hunting her. When she woke, she found that Tara was kissing her and stroking the nape of her neck.

“What is it, Catherine? You twitch in your sleep like a frightened animal.”

“I was an animal in my sleep and I was frightened.”

She kissed him.

They made love again and fell asleep in one another’s arms.

Their relationship does reveal some family skeletons – but there is also the unsettling tension between Malabay and the locals, and in Ireland of the 1980s you can probably imagine what the undercurrent of those tensions is.

Overall, I was impressed by Garnett’s writing. This wasn’t published just because of her family connections. A lot of the novel is in dialogue, and she is good at the emotions that hover below the surface and come through awkwardly – even if her characters are perhaps more willing to discuss their feelings than most Brits would be.

It’s often quite bitingly witty too, particularly when Pake is being scathing, or when his ex-wife Poppy turns up. You do feel for Catherine, a little boat on the sea of all this wit, intelligence, and experience – having to learn how to craft her own personality against a backdrop of so many powerful personalities.

It’s certainly a very evocative novel, and the plotting includes some big events and revelations without losing the sense that we are in a deeply real world. Somehow it doesn’t feel of the 1980s, though some of the plot is inextricable from it – take that away, and it could easily be the 1930s. Perhaps that is the ethereal timelessness Garnett brings to the narrative.

What a talented family. She died just over a year ago, and this was her only novel. A shame – I would certainly have been intrigued to see what came next.

Mrs Panopoulis by Jon Godden

Earlier in the year, I read and really loved the odd, cold, psychologically fascinating novel Told in Winter by Jon Godden (sister of the more famous Rumer). So I was keen to try more of her things, and I’m a sucker for novels about older women – so Mrs Panopoulis (1959) winged its way to me. Isn’t the cover gorgeous?

(I should say, at the outset, that I read this in the peak of my eyes getting back to working, and with quite a lot of dizziness, so it wasn’t the ideal time to take it all in. But it has a big font and it’s quite a simple story, so I thought it would be a good place to try reading again. And clearly that was a few months ago, so here goes nothing with this post! For those asking so kindly, health continues to be up and down but eyes have largely been fine, praise the Lord.)

Mrs Panopoulis woke early, as the old do, but even earlier than she usually did because the ship’s engines had stopped. To her it was the stopping of an enormous heart. She lay on her back on the berth, and before she opened her eyes she moved her hand cautiously up to her breast. Her heart was beating unevenly, as it always did, but it was still beating.

Waves of light were running across the white-painted ceiling; she knew that they were reflections from the sea outside, but for a moment she could not remember where she was. The sound she heard in her sleep came again, a high, shrill mewing. “Seagulls!” she said, still half asleep, and then, “We have arrived.”

Typing that out now, I really like Godden’s writing. Maybe I wasn’t in the right state to appreciate it when I read it. Anyway, Mrs P and the people on her cruise have arrived at an island off the coast of ‘Portuguese East Africa’, whatever that is or was. Among the group are a pair of young things who have yet to acknowledge that they love each other, Martin and Flora (Mrs P’s great-niece) – Martin has travelled to meet a business partner whom he idolises. And Mrs Panopoulis has determined that she will shape their destiny.

The depiction of the island hovers on that line between interesting travel literature and not-very-sensitive cultural hierarchies. It isn’t out-and-out racist, but it also isn’t the most comfortable read. I’m felt that Godden was on safer ground when she was talking about the tourists who’d travelled there and the ex-pats who lived there. Mrs Panopoulis herself is a little sharp and rude, but driven by a thirst for adventure and an impatience with her own increasing age.

There were a lot of things to like in Mrs Panopoulis, not least the fully realised depiction of an old woman who doesn’t fall into any of the old-woman stereotypes. But, overall, I wish the novel had a bit more depth, a little more cultural sensitivity, and, without giving anything away, an entirely different ending.

So, this Godden isn’t in the same league as Told in Winter, but it might be one to revisit at some point, to see if I missed anything the first time around.

 

Stuck in a Book’s Weekend Miscellany

I hope you have lovely, socially distanced plans for this weekend – maybe the last of our sunny weather here in the UK? Well, there’s already an autumnal snap in the air (and a hole in my roof, leaking water into the living room… thankfully fixed now, and somehow it managed to leak in about the only place where books aren’t piled up. Phew!)

Whatever you have planned, here’s a book, a blog post, and a link. Oh, and make sure you’re registered to vote if you qualify for American elections! Please help protect the rest of us who can’t vote there. And yes, I’ll nail my colours to the mast, that means voting the Biden/Harris ticket. At this point I’ve stopped even pretending to have sympathy for people who would vote for somebody as cruel, narcissistic, ignorant, racist, sexist, and unpresidential as Trump.

Welp, that got more political than this blog has ever been, I suspect! Here’s the normal bookish stuff…

1.) The blog post – please check out Ali’s wonderful list of 10 Vintage Books of Joy. It’s not the usual sort of book list you see, because many of these are a little out-of-the-way – but they’re all brilliant. Well, the eight I’ve read are, and I’ve now bought Something Light to add to my sprawling Margery Sharp collection.

2.) The book – I have a review copy of this on the way, but thought I’d mention now: Felix Unbound by Cathy Gunn. What would happen if your cat turned into a human? I love animal metamorphosis stories (and wrote about them in my DPhil – Lady Into Fox is wonderful) and so I hope this lives up to its premise and its promise.

3.) The link – the British Library shop is doing 3-for-2 on fiction paperbacks and you KNOW that includes the British Library Women Writers series! And, indeed, preorders. So I heartily recommend you get your mitts on them soon – let me know if you want advice about which to choose…

Three mini reviews

I have a whole pile of books I’ve read recently, but quite a lot of them are ones I don’t feel inspired to write whole posts about. Not least because my memory for what happens in books seems to be getting even worse in the pandemic. But you know what’s a god solution to that? Mini reviews! So, here are three books I’ve read recently…

Family Album by Antonia Ridge

This was a recommendation from Michelle, a reader of Stuck in a Book. It’s from the 1950s, about a middle-aged woman called Dorothy Durand who decides to go to France to track down the Durand family to whom she is related. It’s gentle and fun, and she tears about France to track down relatives like nobody’s business. My only reservation is that there’s a lot of exposition and history at the beginning, and it isn’t (for me) until she gets to France that the book really gets going. Sweet and jolly, and an undercurrent of well-drawn human emotion. And, for once, I didn’t mind stories of people travelling around a foreign country – perhaps because she was motivated by an emotional quest, rather than by describing the scenery.

The Birds of the Air by Alice Thomas Ellis

Reading an Alice Thomas Ellis novel (bearing in mind this is only my second) is like reading a Muriel Spark only I have no idea what’s going on. An eccentric family come together for a Christmas meal, with all sorts of antipathies and painful memories and barbed comments. Maybe I need to concentrate more, but I did rather lose the handle of who everyone was and how they related and what was happening. But the writing is sharp and funny and occasionally jolting.

Turnabout by Thorne Smith

I had high hopes, discovering Smith and his propensity for fantastic plots (my jam). This is a body swap comedy from the 1930s, where a warring husband and wife find that a small Egyptian statue has made them swap bodies to teach them a lesson. It’s totally bonkers. It’s a farce, really, with very unlikely scenarios and heightened arguments comings off the back of this already unlikely event. And – as so often seems to happen in books or films where people have experienced bizarre miracles – Mr and Mrs Willows often forget that they are in the incorrect body. It seems the sort of thing that wouldn’t slip one’s mind. I think I prefer this sort of fantastic book where it’s the only wild thing that happens, and then people respond as one might in the circumstances. Nobody has ever behaved like the people in this book, and it was fun to read but might be more fun as a cartoon.

E is for Essex

This is part of an ongoing series where I write about a different author for each letter of the alphabet. You can see them all here.

There are going to be a handful of letters in this series that aren’t that easy. None of us are looking forward to X. But I didn’t have to think too hard to come up with my E – even if the author is really a B. Step forward Mary Essex, pseudonym of the extremely prolific author Ursula Bloom.

How many books do I have by Mary Essex?

I have five, as you can see – not up there with the Crompton and Delafield numbers. I do also have a couple under the name Ursula Bloom, but I haven’t read either of them. From the research I’ve done, Bloom seemed to write quite differently under different names – she had about five pseudonyms – so I’ll treat the Essex novels as a class unto themselves. It’s hard to find an exact number of books she wrote but it’s definitely in the hundreds – of which more than 50 are under the name Mary Essex.

How many of these have I read?

Four – from the above set, I haven’t read The Herring’s Nest.

How did I start reading Essex?

I think it was 2002 and I was in Oxford, a couple of years before I moved there. I mosied into a charity shop (that is now an HQ for a bus company) and was drawn to the title Tea Is So Intoxicating. As who would not be?

This was back in the days when I used to read books shortly after I bought them – hollow laugh – so I read it in late 2002. I remember that I read it immediately after Moby Dick, and for years I wondered if I only liked it because it wasn’t Moby Dick. But when I finally tried some more of her work, I really liked it.

General impressions…

Mary Essex certainly isn’t the most highbrow reading in the world, but nor is it anywhere near as trashy as you’d expect from an author who seemed to write a book every five minutes. Later in her career, the Mary Essex novels seem to be lean more towards romance, especially medical romance – but in the 40s and some of the 50s, they followed less of a predictable pattern.

Yes, she overuses exclamation marks – but the characters are thoughtfully drawn and the books are often very funny, especially The Amorous Bicycle. Yep, she had a way with a title.

I’m really pleased that Tea Is So Intoxicating is coming out from the British Library Women Writers series next month, so more people can enjoy her. It’s definitely towards the lighter end of what the series has published, but we can all do with some of that sometimes, can’t we?

StuckinaBook’s Weekend Miscellany

Hons and Rebels (No. 52)

2020 just keeps going, doesn’t it? What a long, long year. I hope you have some good plans this weekend, and that they’re able to go ahead. I’ll be meeting up with my ‘bubble’ (my brother) so I’ll get to hug someone, which we never thought would become a novelty, did we?

Anyway, whatever you’ve got going on, here’s the usual link, blog

post, and book to accompany you on your way.

1.) The link – on my recent review of The Silent Woman by Janet Malcolm, Jenny of Reading the End left a link to an NYRB article Malcolm wrote about her libel lawsuits. It is fascinating in a totally Malcolm way.

2.) The blog post – I enjoyed Danielle’s take on a reading prompt of ‘ready for new beginnings’. Aren’t we all, at the moment? And so many excellent novels and memoirs could fit that description. Go and see what Danielle chose.

3.) The book – the latest Slightly Foxed Edition (my goodness, how I love them) is Jessica Mitford’s brilliant memoir Hons and Rebels. It’s about her childhood as part of the notorious Mitford sisters, but also a lot more than that as she grows older and forms her own identity. And you won’t find a lovelier edition than this, because SF Editions are the nicest books in the world.

British Library Women Writers #4: Dangerous Ages by Rose Macaulay

I intend to write about each of the British Library Women Writers titles as they come out, though I’m already a bit behind because the brilliant Father by Elizabeth von Arnim is also out now!

I knew, when I was first asked about women writers who shouldn’t be out of print anymore, that I was keen to get some more Rose Macaulay back. She is well known for The Towers of Trebizond, her final novel, but I prefer her witty, spiky novels of the 1920s. Perhaps they are less of a tour de force, but they have an awful lot to say about contemporary (middle-class) society, and they’re a hoot. I’m pleased to say that Handheld Press and Vintage have also been bringing back some of her novels from that period and, who knows, maybe some others will find their way into the BLWW series at some point. But there was one obvious choice for a series that looks at how novels reflected women’s lives in the early 20th century: Dangerous Ages (1921) does it for a whole bunch of different women.

Those women are several generations of the same family. Neville is in her 40s (yes, ‘her’ – Macaulay often gave her female characters male names) and thinking about resuming her career as a doctor. Her daughter is part of a generation that dismisses everything pre-20th-century and talks a lot about ‘free love’ etc – in fact, let me interrupt this list to give a wonderful piece of Macaulay dryness:

“Marriage,” said Gerda, “is so Victorian. It’s like antimacassars.”

“Now, my dear, do you mean anything by either of those statements? Marriage wasn’t invented in Victoria’s reign. Nor did it occur more frequently in that reign than it did before or does now. Why Victorian then? And why antimacassars? Think it out. How can a legal contract be like a doily on the back of a chair? Where is the resemblance? It sounds like a riddle, only there’s no answer. No, you know you’ve got no answer. That kind of remark is sheer sentimentality and muddle headedness. Why are people in their twenties so often sentimental? That’s another riddle.”

Neville’s grandmother is in her 80s and pretty content with life. But the character I found most interesting in many ways was Neville’s mother, known always in the novel as Mrs Hilary.

Mrs Hilary is in her 60s, ignored by the world, craving just a little bit of attention from anyone – and one of the options she experiments with is psychoanalysis. That’s what I wrote about in my afterword for the book, because it was such a ‘thing’ in the 1920s.

‘What you really wanted was some man whose trade it was to listen and to give heed. Some man to whom your daughter’s pneumonia, of however long ago, was not irrelevant, but had its own significance, as having helped to build you up as you were, you, the problem, with your wonderful, puzzling temperament, so full of complexes, inconsistencies, and needs. Some man who didn’t lose interest in you just because you were gray-haired and sixty-three.’

Macaulay is very witty about Freudianism, as so many writers were at the time, but also sees the need that it is answering in Mrs Hilary and the way that society neglected her. Which is impressive, considering she was only in her forties at the time herself.

There is a lot going on in this novel, and more characters and concerns than I have covered in this short review, but what holds it together is Macaulay’s intense interest in her characters. She laughs at them, but she understands them too. Each portrait is affectionate and kind, even when the ridiculous is on show. And it’s a complete delight of a novel. I’m so pleased it’s back in print, where it deserves to be!