What Next? by Denis Mackail – #1920Club

I promise not all of the authors I’ve chosen for the 1920 Club begin with ‘Mac’ – but I’ve been meaning to read a few more Denis Mackail novels that I’ve had around for a while. His name is probably familiar to you from Greenery Street, the sweet story of early married life that Persephone republished – but he was prolific and there are plenty of other novels to explore, though most of them are pretty difficult to find. What Next? was his first.

What Next? is set over the course of three days, and it’s rather a dizzying novel in terms of what happens and it terms of how it’s written. The hero, for want of a better word, is Jim. He’s a young, affable, wealthy, rather hopeless young man who is immersed in club life, spends his days doing little of value, and frequently proposes to a young woman called Mary who is very fond of him and refuses to take him seriously. In other words, they’re the sort of young pair familiar to any Edwardian reader of Punch, and who more or less survived the First World War as archetypes, slowly petering out in the decades to follow.

Jim continues to affable but very soon ceases to be wealthy – as the rich relative who had kept him living luxury dies, leaving behind a bankrupt and ruined company. Jim learns in the first pages of the novel that he has been left with practically no money, and must learn to economise. Which he does by going to his club and having dinner, and unloading his cares onto his manservant, Lush.

Lush proves not just to be good at serving drinks and listening – he is also something of a financial mastermind, and needs only capital in order to accumulate enormous riches. And it’s here that we come across the first of the many times that Mackail gives a character an enormously long, expository speech. Lush explains in great detail what he intends to do, but it’s the sort of detail that is more confusing than none – somehow still very abstract, and I left with no real clue what Lush intended to do to re-secure the riches. Luckily Jim seems to be convinced, and lends Lush his last remaining money to give it a go – and Lush disappears.

Jim believes that Lush has absconded with his cash – but no, of course not, he returns and has trebled it! He even explains how, in a long, expository speech – that doesn’t seem even remotely related to what he said he’d do in the first place. Never mind.

Around this point, the novel shifts into being much more about a road trip, unveiling a corrupt fellow, and reuniting Mary and Jim. There’s precious little connection between the first half and the second half – except a fondness for monologues that last several pages. It becomes a sort of romantic moral caper at the end, and the financial stuff that dominated the first half of the novel is quietly forgotten.

So, What Next? shows a great deal of writerly immaturity when it comes to plotting, structure, and exposition. Here’s the weird paradox – I really liked it. Mackail might be weak at those things here, and I’ve seen similar issues in novels he wrote nearly thirty years later, but what he’s so great at is tone. He is great at creating something sprightly, whimsical, joyful. There are hints of A.A. Milne’s ‘Rabbits’, or of a toned-down Wodehouse. Very much of its era, it’s the sort of atmosphere I lap up in a novel – and totally reflective of its era, as is befitting for a club readalong.

And I had to single out this bit to quote…

Of the literary contents of his not inconsiderable library he had a fair but by no means exhaustive knowledge, finding, as many have found, that a book which while still lying unbought and uncut in the monastic odour of a bookseller’s shop cannot be put down, has yet an unaccountable habit of losing its interest when removed to one’s own fireside; and having also fallen a victim to the weakness, only to be indulged in by the rich, which does so much to keep the literary world on its legs, of always ordering the whole of an author’s output whenever he had derived pleasure from a single example of it.

Potterism by Rose Macaulay #1920Club

If I were thinking about my favourite authors, there’s a strong possibility that Rose Macaulay would be bubbling under on that list. While none of her novels are my absolute favourites, she is consistently very good. She’s now best known for The Towers of Trebizond and The World My Wilderness, I think, and I do really like those accomplished books – but I prefer her ironic comedies of the 1920s. She was very prolific at that time, and books like Crewe TrainKeeping Up Appearances, and Dangerous Ages are total delights. Indeed, Dangerous Ages is one of my choices for the British Library Women Writers series.

Potterism was Macaulay’s first book of the decade and was also her first bestseller – which, given the subtitle ‘A tragi-farcical tract’, might be rather unexpected. If it’s a tract at all, it’s a stab at popular journalism of the day – and, equally, a stab at those who opposed it.

The title comes from the name Potter. This Potter (later Lord something) is a newspaper proprietor and a straight-forward, kind, hard-working man who is somehow rather simple-minded while possessing great business acumen. In fact, let’s let Macaulay describe him:

Both commonplace and common was Mr Percy Potter (according to some standards), but clever, with immense patience, a saving sense of humour, and that imaginative vision without which no newspaper owner, financier, general, politician, poet, or criminal can be great. He was, in fact, greater than the twins would ever be, because he was not at odds with his material: he found such stuff as his dreams were made of ready to his hand, in the great heart of the public – that last place where the twins would have thought of looking.

He has made his money writing for a lower class of public who want their news given without affectation – his wife, a sillier version of him, does similar things for the popular novel reading public, under the name Leila Yorke. She was writing the sort of book that was extremely popular in the ’20s, and which perhaps we’ll hear more about as the week goes on.

[How like Macaulay to include ‘criminal’ there!] But the people who make up the term ‘Potterism’ are close to home – among them, the Potters’ children. His twins, mentioned in that quote,  Jane and Johnny are part of the Anti-Potterism League. The League is created by Oxbridge intellectual types who despise the general public and the humbug that is handed to them. To the minds of Jane and Johnny, despising Potterism has nothing to do with the affection for their father – and he is generous enough to find it amusing rather than appalling. Everybody goes through that phase, perhaps.

Macaulay is excellent at making fun of everyone at the same time. There are more tragic characters, like one of the Potters’ other child, Clare, who is not clever or contented. But mostly, we see youthful arrogance and close-minded, middle-class settling for mediocrity, and doses of hypocrisy all on much of an even playing field. I certainly didn’t ever get the impression that Macaulay was siding strongly with anybody, or writing to proclaim the truth of one viewpoint against the falseness of another. Rather, she is looking around at the highbrow vs middlebrow battles of the period – and finding everyone absurd.

Among many impressive things in this impressive novel is that way that it segues into something of a murder mystery, or at least a death mystery, without seeming inconsistent. The only thing that does threaten the tone of the novel is that Macaulay gives different sections to different narrators, with the first and last of the five sections being in the third person. It’s a technique that is used a lot now, but I think Potterism would have been a better novel had it all been in the third person – not least because two of the three narrators are fairly negligible members of the Anti-Potterism League, and the section narrated by ‘Leila Yorke’ is mainly an exercise in Macaulay having fun at the expense of a certain sort of over-dramatic person. Macaulay’s narrative voice is the most amusing and the most satisfying, and I didn’t want to lose it.

A very strong start to the 1920 Club, and a reminder that I must read more of the Macaulay novels on my shelves – and hunt for those that remain elusive. And, happy news, Potterism will be reprinted by Handheld Press later in the year – I certainly recommend getting hold of a copy.

#1920Club – round up

The 1920 Club kicks off tomorrow – what better way to spend a Bank Holiday Monday, if you have such a thing?

Put links to your reviews on this post, and I’ll round them all up at the end of the week.

And if you have any suggestions for which club year Karen and I should do next, let us know that too.

Happy reading…

The Master Man by Ruby M. Ayres

Stuck in a Book

The Happy Foreigner by Enid Bagnold

HeavenAli

Call Mr Fortune by H.C. Bailey

Kaggsy’s Bookish Ramblings

Mary Rose, A Play in Three Acts by J.M. Barrie

Relevant Obscurity

Glinda of Oz by L. Frank Baum

Pining for the West

Queen Lucia by E.F. Benson

Lizzy’s Literary Life

She Reads Novels

Madame Bibi Lophile

The Princess of the School by Angela Brazil

Scones and Chaises Longues

Development by Bryher

Neglected Books

R.U.R by Karel Capek

Typings

Youth and the Bright Medusa by Willa Cather
What Cathy Read Next

The Mysterious Affair at Styles by Agatha Christie

Book Around the Corner

746 Books

Book Tapestry

Kaggsy’s Bookish Ramblings

Bitter Tea and Mystery

Katharine Harding

Cheri by Colette

Buried in Print

Harriet Devine’s Blog

What Me Read

Tension by E.M. Delafield

Stuck in a Book

The Heel of Achilles by E.M. Delafield

Stuck in a Book

The Top of the World by Ethel M. Dell

Staircase Wit

Penny Plain by O. Douglas

HeavenAli

Adventures in Reading, Running, and Working from Home

The Cut-Glass Bowl by F. Scott Fitzgerald

Love Books, Read Books

Flappers and Philosophers by F. Scott Fitzgerald

Ripple Effects

Miss Lulu Bett by Zona Gale

The Literary Sisters

In Chancery by John Galsworthy

Booked For Life

Wandering by Hermann Hesse

1stReading’s Blog

The Farcical History of Richard Greenow by Aldous Huxley

Tony’s Book World

Women in Love by D.H. Lawrence
Eiger, Mönch & Jungfrau

A Voyage to Arcturus by David Lindsay

1stReading’s Blog

Katharine Harding

The Doom That Came to Sarnath by H. P. Lovecraft

What Me Read

Potterism by Rose Macaulay

Stuck in a Book

What Next? by Denis Mackail

Stuck in a Book

Miss Brill by Katherine Mansfield

Brona’s Books

The Wind Blows by Katherine Mansfield

Brona’s Books

Psychology by Katherine Mansfield

Brona’s Books

The Stepmother by A.A. Milne

The Captive Reader

If I May by A.A. Milne

The Captive Reader

Further Chronicles of Avonlea by L.M. Montgomery

Staircase Wit

Every Man for Himself by Hopkins Moorhouse

The Dusty Bookcase

The Great Impersonation by E. Phillips Oppenheim

Staircase Wit

A Hot Cup of Pleasure

Dulce et Decorum Est by Wilfred Owen

Typings

The Guermantes Way by Marcel Proust

Kaggsy’s Bookish Ramblings

The Bridal Wreath by Sigrid Undset

What Me Read

In The Mountains by Elizabeth von Arnim

Karen’s Books and Chocolate

The Black Grippe by Edgar Wallace

ANZ Litlover’s LitBlog

The Age of Innocence by Edith Wharton

Book Word

Tredynas Days

Kaggsy’s Bookish Ramblings

The Cask by Freeman Wills Crofts

A Hot Cup of Pleasure

Madame Bibi Lophile

Stories by Virginia Woolf

Kaggsy’s Bookish Ramblings

Essays by Virginia Woolf

Kaggsy’s Bookish Ramblings

A Bite of the Apple by Lennie Goodings

I’m over at Shiny New Books with a review of A Bite of the Apple – the new memoir by Lennie Goodings about Virago Books. It’s a fascinating and personal book – here’s the full review, and below is the opening of what I wrote.

There’s a certain variety of person who can always spot a bottle-green spine at a hundred paces, and has faced the agonising decision about whether to shelve their Virago Modern Classics together or in with the rest of their books. I, reader, am one such person (and they’re shelved together, for what it’s worth) – Virago Modern Classics has introduced me to any number of wonderful writers, and I have plenty left to read. And it’s chiefly the idea of finding out more about the VMCs that made me delighted when I heard that Lennie Goodings had written A Bite of the Apple.

#1920Club – starting soon!

It’s that time of year again – though time has ceased to mean very much to me. But it IS April and it IS time for another club year – this time, our earliest yet: 1920 club.

It’s kicking off on Monday – join me and Karen in reading any book published in 1920, and sharing your thoughts on your blog, on GoodReads or LibraryThing, or in the comments on our posts. Just drop us a link when you’re done, and together we’ll build up a good picture of what the reading world was like 100 years ago! All books welcome, and all languages – as long as it was first published in 1920, then perfect.

It’s a weird, strange, anxious time – I think taking a trip back to 1920 seems quite inviting. But obviously if you’re not feeling like you can read anything at the moment, there’s absolutely no guilt in giving this one a miss. Join us in October for whatever the next club year is, and hopefully we’ll be back to normal!

Who’s the most annoying man in literature?

I’m not doing very well at book reviews at the moment, though there is quite a pile to write about. So I’m going to go for a fun, silly, interactive post instead, based on a question that came up on Twitter a while ago. We were talking about the most inspiring heroines, and decided to flip it – who is the most annoying man in literature?

Crucially, this is annoying, nor evil. We’re not looking for the Heathcliffs of this world, driven only by hatred and evil. We’re talking the ones who really get under your skin – either deliberately on the part of the author, or not.

My choice: Henry from E.M. Forster’s Howards End. The way Forster writes his dialogue is so clever – everything he says is based on some sort of internal logic that is hard to untangle, even when you know it is selfish and ruthless. When his wife questions his decisions, he focuses on the indignity of being questioned, not on the decisions he’s made. Just thinking about him riles me up!

Other suggestions that came up – Mr Rochester from Jane Eyre [my view: can’t stand him, but he might be cruel rather than annoying], Edward Casuabon from Middlemarch [I haven’t read it so can’t comment] and Angel Clare from Tess of the D’Ubervilles [yep, tracks].

I think, to really win this category, it has to be a character that the author has deliberately made annoying, and not in a funny way. Mr Collins in Pride and Prejudice would be enormously irritating to be around, but I can’t imagine many readers are annoyed when reading about him because Austen is so funny about it.

Over to you – who would you pick?

How to read in anxious times

Things have escalated really quickly, haven’t they? I don’t know what the situation is in your country, but the UK has gone into full lockdown today. I think most of us are in the stage of finding it surreal – unless we know somebody directly affected, of course, and then it’s all too real. I’ve not been outside my house and garden for a week, and the only human contact I’ve had has been virtual or (at a safe distance) with neighbours over the fence.

If you’re anything like me, you’ve probably had a few people say that you can finally read all your books -I’ve been saying it to people too. There’s definitely no shortage of books to read around the house. At a conservative estimate, I have over 1500 unread books.

And then there are the lists of books to read during lockdown, appearing in blogs and newspapers and so forth. They’re great, and Rachel has put together a wonderful list.

I hope you’re finding the lists helpful. I hope you are able to get down to some books you’ve been meaning to read.

But I’m writing this for the readers who are struggling to work out how to read at all.

I certainly have plenty of time to read, though I’ve also been having an unprecedented number of phone and video calls. But I am finding it difficult to read anything very much at the moment. I sit down with a pile, intending to change between them and have a nice evening of reading – and I’m only a few paragraphs in when I realise that I haven’t taken in anything. My mind, like all of our minds, is on coronavirus. About what the future looks like.

And it’s not just that. It’s the scary amount of choice, and the scary amount of time. Usually I grab something and read it on my lunch break, or after I come home from something, or for a few hours on a Saturday. Now I have seemingly endless time and seemingly endless options. It’s overwhelming.

I’m trying different things. I picked a light 1920s book. I picked non-fiction essays. I picked Pride and Prejudice. And I am getting through things, slowly. I’m even enjoying them – Lucy Gayheart, the Willa Cather I’m currently reading for the next episode of Tea or Books?, is brilliant. But it’s not coming easily.

And I wanted to share this to say – if you haven’t worked out how to read at this moment, that’s OK. It will probably come as we get used to this new normal. And if it doesn’t, that’s ok too. Your mind is doing all sorts of backflips and cartwheels. There’s no guilt if nothing is distracting you.

There’s also no guilt if you have to go to a pile of Agatha Christies, or re-read books you loved as a child, or only read magazines. If you’re not using this opportunity to read War and Peace, don’t worry. Reading can be a wonderful lifeline at the moment but if – like me – you’re finding it a lifeline that sometimes gives way, and you just need to watch Netflix for a bit, then know that I’m in the same boat. For now.

British Library Women Writers #1: The Tree of Heaven by May Sinclair

The first lot of British Library Women Writers reprints are out! And in this uncertain and scary world, I think this series is more vital than ever, in these difficult times – bookshops are probably closed now, but the British Library are still delivering from their shop and lots of local indies are still doing postal delivery.

If you missed my announcement a while ago – this Women Writers series is reprinting novels by and about women from the first half of the 20th century, and I’m lucky enough to be series consultant! I’m also writing the afterword for each one, picking out a particular contemporary issue in the novel. For The Tree of Heaven, I wrote about suffragettes. I’m a bit nervous about my afterwords being out in the world, and hoping that people enjoy them – though of course the main thing is the novel itself.

I didn’t choose these first couple of novels, The Tree of Heaven and My Husband Simon – though they’re great – but I did choose the next batch. More on those soon! As they become available, I’m going to be putting up reviews.

The Tree of Heaven was published in 1917, and it’s always interesting to read a novel published during a World War, because obviously the author doesn’t know how or when it will end. It certainly has an effect on all the members of the family at the centre of the novel: there are four Harrison children, Dorothea/Dorothy, Michael, Nicholas/Nicky, and John. Sinclair is clever in the way that uses each of them to embody something major going on at the time, without making them seem too much like stock characters or simply there to represent a theme. Michael, for instance, is in the aesthetic set – all poetry magazines and being anti-patriotism – while Dorothea gets swept up in the suffrage movement.

They grow realistically from children to adults over the course of the novel, and there is a middle section called ‘the vortex’ where each of them finds that their particular interest or allegiance might lead them into a ‘vortex’ that removes their individuality:

For Dorothy was afraid of the Feminist Vortex […] She was afraid of the herded women. She disliked the excited faces, and the high voices skirling their battle-cries, and the silly business of committees, and the platform slang. She was sick and shy before the tremor and the surge of collective feeling; she loathed the gestures and the movements of the collective soul, the swaying and heaving and rushing forward of the many as one. She would not be carried away by it; she would keep the clearness and hardness of her soul.

There’s a lot going on with signing up – or not signing up – to fight, and there’s a subplot about the disputed parentage of another character. There’s a lot going on and, being the 1910s, there is a slightly heightened emotionality to everything – but Sinclair weaves all the strands together really well. I think she’s better at women than men, or at least I found more to engage me in Dorothea’s uncertainty about whether the means justifies the ends in militant suffragism than I did in the different boys’ decisions about whether or not to fight. Not that that isn’t an important discussion, but it felt like Sinclair was a little less invested in it herself, and it’s high and low points lean a little closer to emotional cliche.

But it’s a really engaging, enjoyable, and moving novel. If you’ve only read Life and Death of Harriett Frean then there is a great deal more to love about Sinclair – and this one isn’t as melancholy, though it certainly isn’t a chuckle-fest!

I promise my afterword was more thoroughly researched and diligently edited than this outpouring of thoughts late on a Sunday night ;) – something to compare and contrast if you do get a copy! I’ll be back with more on the other books in the series soon – and revealing which books will be published in the series in the autumn [though if you’re impatient, they’re all in the British Library catalogue and listed on Amazon already].

StuckinaBook’s Weekend Miscellany

Haven’t had one of these for a while, but I think we need some things to cheer us up. Here are three that have caught my attention recently…

1.) The link – is to the site of Simon Palmer, an artist whose work I saw shared on Twitter. They’re country scenes that combine a sense of the magical with a firm understanding of nature. If I saw any of them on the cover of a novel, I’d want to read the novel.

2.) The book – it might seem like an odd time to read about a serial killer, but Dean Street Press have recently reissued Israel Rank by Roy Horniman – under the title of the more-famous film it became, Kind Hearts and Coronets. I’ve not started it yet, but I loved the film many years ago so am looking forward to exploring.

3.) The blog post – I was part of a little group encouraging Ali to try the wonderful Gilead by Marilynne Robinson. And, hurrah, she did!

A trip to Scotland [the other bits]

A few of you asked to hear more about my Scotland trip, and I am very happy to oblige! Gosh, it feels a million years ago now. I do hope you are all keeping healthy, physically and mentally, in this strange new world. I’m self-isolating at the moment, as I have cold symptoms and don’t want to take chances with the health of people around me. Living on my own, I’m going to especially appreciate the online book world this week – and for the next weeks and months.

Anyway, back to Scotland! All the photos in this post are by my friend Will, one of the people who went on the trip. I can definitely recommend taking a talented photographer with you on hols! It’s definitely nicer to have an album of images of this quality, rather than the blurred pics off my phone.

This is the rather extraordinary place that I went with my brother and four friends – yes, we had the whole thing to ourselves.

My room was on the top floor on the right – the fourth floor or the fifth floor, depending on whether you’re English or not! Yes, a lot of stairs, and possibly the old servants quarters – but what a lovely little room. I say ‘little’ – it’s much, much bigger than my bedroom at home, but all the other rooms are so enormous that it felt small.

We’ve been way as a group three times, and we take it in turns to cook – but tend to get a takeaway on the first night. Finding someone willing to deliver to a castle in the middle of nowhere wasn’t the easiest, but we did land upon a very nice curry place (and got so much food that we could have lunch the next day too). Col and I made toad-in-the-hole on our day, which is a family favourite meal and which I seldom have, as it doesn’t make much sense to cook it for one. We battled through the combination of vegetarians and gluten-free people! Luckily we had one person who’d been to boarding school, and thus will eat anything, food or otherwise.

The reason we’d gone up to Dumfries and Galloway was because of its proximity to Wigtown, the bookshop town. It was a first trip there for all of us, so I don’t know how much it’s changed over the years. This time, there were six bookshops, I think – some of which are only open half the week, so we naturally had to go twice.

Going back to Hay-on-Wye many times has a slightly melancholy aspect – because there are fewer bookshops each time. Maybe that’s true in Wigtown. But I had an encouraging chat with a bookshop owner called Ruth, who had only been there for eighteen months. Her shop was delightfully cosy, with a sofa covered in blankets and the feel of being in a very bookish person’s [large] living room.

But, yes, the main attraction was The Bookshop, where Shaun Bythell works. Several of us had read The Diary of a Bookseller and its sequel, Confessions of a Bookseller. Listeners to ‘Tea or Books?’ may remember that my friend Lorna came on the show to talk about it – the self-same Lorna is in this pic, with me [right] and her husband Will [left].

We all wanted to meet Shaun but, as anybody who’s read his book or follows the shop on social media knows, he has a reputation for being scathingly funny. I was rather terrified that I’d blurt out something idiotic and then have to wait a few years to find myself in print. But – we did meet him, and he was very nice. I was buying a copy of Diary of a Bookseller there, because I wanted a copy which quotes my Shiny New Book’s review, and he offered to sign it for me. Lorna mentioned that I was quoted in it, which I was too nervous to say, and he was also nice about that. Phew! We got through it without making fools of ourselves. And we bought a nice pile of books between us.

Unsurprisingly, my brother did not buy any books in there. He’s used to doing crosswords in the corner of bookshops while I hunt. But he did buy one book in a different bookshop – the one that is rented as an airbnb, so you run a bookshop on holiday. It was Michael Palin’s Around the World in Eighty Days, in case you’re interested – and above, here he is in a bookshop, actually the one in Carlisle, holding another actual book. [No, apparently this is The Book Shop – thanks Rebecca!] Wonders will never cease!

It was such a wonderful holiday. Other than books, we mostly read, chatted, played board games, and went for a walk to the coast. Until the tide came in, and then we had a scramble onto a golf course, and a walk along that…

I’m so glad we managed to go before coronavirus lockdown happened. I know we’re really lucky. I’m thinking of and praying for you all. Here’s to sharing lots of the joy of reading while we wait for what happens next.