Today I had an action-packed day in London, and I did get through quite a lot of a book on the train to and from, but not a whole book. Luckily I only had 40 minutes left on an audiobook of Joe Cinque’s Consolation (2004) by Helen Garner, and I finished it as I was driving into the railway station.
I’m making my way through everything available by Garner on audiobooks – well, everything non-fiction – and Joe Cinque’s Consolation has a lot in common with This House of Grief, published ten years later. It is about a tragic death and the impact it has on those in horrendous mourning, and it closely follows the trial of somebody accused of murder. In this case, though, it’s pretty unambiguous that they committed the killing: one of the central questions is whether or not they have diminished responsibility.
Joe Cinque was in his 20s when Anu Singh, his girlfriend, drugged him with rohypnol and injected large quantities of heroin into him while he slept. During the night, he dramatically died. I’ll spare you some of the more graphic details (which Garner does not spare the reader). Anu Singh had told various friends that she planned to kill him and then kill herself – various motives flew around, from her fear that he would leave her, to her own hypochondriacal (and incorrect) obsession that she had a muscle-wasting disease. None of the friends reported what Anu had said until it was too late, and one of the friends (who had been involved in getting the heroin) is also tried for murder.
Garner got involved in the story after a previous joint trial of both murder-accused broke down, and the decision was made to do separate cases. The book is very Garner: she is interested in the minutaie of the trial, down to the expressions and foibles of each witness. She is as compelled by the way in which people on the stand might make a half-hearted joke as she is with the finer points of law.
Beyond the courtroom, she interviews various people, including Joe Cinque’s distraught parents. (Anu Singh refused to be interviewed.) The scene where she first meets them is fascinating – not only for what she learns from them, but for how she frames it and reflects on it. “Her voice was heavy with the authority of suffering” is a brilliant and concise observation of Mrs Cinque. And afterwards she goes over the mistakes she made as an interviewer – and for sitting, unawares, in the chair that had usually been Joe. Garner takes us so far behind the scenes of reporting that the reporting becomes almost the heart of the book – without retracting from the seriousness of the crime.
A mix of criminology, psychology, elegy and character study, almost nobody else could have written a book like this – Janet Malcolm is the only other name who comes to mind (someone Garner is often compared to, and she does mention The Silent Woman, Malcolm’s brilliant book about the aftermath of Sylvia Plath and Ted Hughes). I think I’ve almost run out of Garner’s full-length non-fiction, but it’s been a fascinating journey.
I found this book deeply unsettling, even disturbing, in a way that I didn’t find This House of Grief. She is unparalleled though as a chronicler, and an astute observer of character. Her diaries are amazing too. And have you read The First Stone?
I have! If you click on ‘Garner’ tag up above, you should find my review – I thought it was fascinating, not least for what even someone like Helen Garner would write about sexual assault not so long ago (i.e. not taking it very seriously).
This sounds a tough read. I’ve not read any of Garner’s non-fiction but she does sound very impressive.
I think This House of Grief is still the best I’ve read, but it might just be that the first you read leaves the biggest mark.
This does sound a masterful piece of work. I’m impressed that you managed to cope with it; I don’t think I could.
I did end up skipping forward a few times on the audio!
Garner never fails to take my breath away, no matter the subject – sounds like she’s having the same effect on you! :)
Absolutely! I’m running out of non-fic now though…
I am a big Garner fan. Unfortunately I read The first stone, and Joe Cinque’s consolation, before blogging. I disagreed with her intensely on the first, and to some degree on the second, but I love them because of her writing, and her honesty in putting these issues out there. I read This house of grief since blogging and I agree that it is also good – and I had less disagreement regarding what she had to say in it. As I think you know, she loves Janet Malcom – so I have bought a collection of Malcolm writings but I have yet to read them.
I love the breadth of your reading Simon.
Yes, The First Stone was a hard one to take – and I do think she’d write something different now. She mentions Malcolm in a few books, doesn’t she, and I think you’ll like Malcolm if you like Garner’s non-fiction. She has the same occasional breathtaking lack of tact, but is simply superb.