The past couple of days, I’ve read two quite strange novellas. I don’t think they have anything in common except strangeness, so let’s dive in.
The Following Story (1991) by Cees Nooteboom
I hadn’t heard of The Following Story (translated from Dutch by Ina Rilke) until Karen reviewed it the other day, and the premise instantly grabbed me. Herman Mussert wakes up in a hotel room in Portugal – but he doesn’t remember how he got there, and he’s pretty sure he was in Amsterdam the day before.
I had woken up with the ridiculous feeling that I might be dead but whether I was actually dead, or had been dead or vice versa, I could not ascertain. Death, I had learned, was nothingness and if tat was the state you were in, as I had also learned, all deliberation ceased. So that was not the state I was in, since I was still full of musings, thoughts and memories.
As he explores what’s going on in the first-person narrative, we are piecing together who he is. Herman used to teach classics, though now writes travel guides under a pseudonym, and the worlds of Greek and Roman mythology are almost as real to him as his own life. They are rather more real now, in fact. A particular pupil from his teaching days becomes significant, and the timeline dives and weaves between past and present. At one point Herman merges with the myth he is recounting, and the schoolroom past and Lisbon present are equally intermingled. It’s all rather dizzying. Nooteboom never gives us any sure footing or easy conclusions. We are trying to establish Herman’s identity, but he is doing the same thing himself.
But this is also, in a way, a morality tale. The hotel room is a place he once, decades earlier, slept with a married woman. What bearing does that have on the story? I was strongly reminded of a very different writer – May Sinclair’s brilliant short story ‘Where Their Fire Is Not Quench’d’, where a woman keeps running but always ends up in the hotel room where she had an affair.
I really enjoyed the first half of this novella. Nooteboom isn’t trying to give the reader any stability, but the writing is mesmerising and elegant. You can more or less work out what’s going on, even if you’re always a step or two behind, deducing what’s happening a moment or two after it has. I struggled a bit more in the second half… suddenly Herman is on a ship with a wide cast of strange people, going goodness knows where. In Karen’s review, she talked about a ‘gut-punching ending’, but I have to admit I am very hazy on what actually happened in the second half. It all got a bit too frenetic and confusing for me. I think I know what happened to at least one of the main characters, but I’d have liked a little more clarity to have the full emotional impact.
The Bloater (1968) by Rosemary Tonks
Any listener to the Backlisted podcast will doubtless be familiar with Rosemary Tonks – and I think they’re pretty much responsible for this strange, good novella coming back into print. It’s about a BBC sound engineer called Min and her various friendships, dalliances, and (most interestingly to me) profession.
We don’t get a huge anount of the profession, actually, but the novella’s best scenes are those that take us behind the scenes of a BBC audio programme – discussed, as everything in the book is, with jagged, slightly disjointed, often amusing back-and-forth dialogue. Min is nothing if not frank. Though married to a kind, negligible man (he is ‘always on the way to or from the British Museum’), she is preoccupied with possible romances. She and her female friends discuss these things openly, and with a sharp narrative verve that never goes in quite the direction you’d anticipate.
“Yes, but I’ve seen his chest. And I want him dreadfully.”
“Pooh! What’s a chest?”
“This one’s absolutely smooth, with thick rounded shoulders. And it shudders when it’s near me.”
I reflect that you really can’t ask much more than that. So I say disgustedly:
“This is all very objective, Jenny. But what sort of person is he, for G-d’s sake?”
“Quick as a flash, very pop Cambridge, I told you, success and plastic high living. He’d flit through any kind of situation without turning a hair.”
“He sounds genuinely nasty.”
Speaking of nasty, let’s discuss the Bloater of the title. Actual name Carlos, and her lodger, he is a constant presence in Min’s life – and here is how he is introduced:
This huge, tame, exotic man was reading a book as though he was sitting in an airport lounge, with no more regard for me than one has for the factotum in tinted nylon uniform-pyjamas who brings a cup of coffee and wipes over the simulated marble formica with a morsel of rubber skin. Not content with ignoring me, this loafer, this self-regarding bloater – smells. Oh yes, he does. I, personally, can smell him from the kitchen door.
Min seems disgusted and fascinated by the Bloater in equal measures. She invents elaborate excuses to try and avoid him, but then seems quite keen to sleep with him. It’s all very odd and quite unsettling, and you can’t help wondering why she doesn’t spend more time with her poor husband. I’m not sure why the novel is named after the Bloater, rather than (say) Min herself, but perhaps it is representative of the uncertainty at the heart of Min’s character. She doesn’t know what she really wants, but she’ll self-destruct in an effort to get it.
I enjoyed The Bloater mostly for its curious writing style. I’m always drawn to dialogue-heavy books (if they use speech marks!) and the off-kilter way the book chops between sparse sentences reminded me of other, similar mid-century writers like Muriel Spark and Beryl Bainbridge. In her strangeness and slight nastiness, Tonks belongs with those significant names. I’d be interested to see what she can do on longer scale, if any more of her books ever get reprinted.
Two intriguing reviews Simon, thank you. I put ‘The Following Story’ on my ‘want to read’ list, after reading Karen’s recent review, and I am even more interested in reading it now to see if I can work out what is going on and what this ‘gut punching ending’ is (I probably won’t get it and will have that awful wondering what I’ve missed feeling!).
Haha! Well, let’s compare notes in due course.
I’ve just finished ‘The Following Story’ and reread your review and Karen’s. I did really enjoy reading it – the first half more than the second half. I liked the poetic prose and being party to his ruminations. Like you, I did find the second half harder to follow; it was rather confusing and dizzying. I was not really sure what the reader was meant to think but it was certainly impressively learned and thought provoking. Karen’s comments pushed me to be slightly more certain as to what had happened and I can’t really say anymore for the sake of those that have not read it yet! It was great that it was short enough to read in a day and one I think I would like to reread sometime to see what a second reading makes me conclude. One for a future tea or books maybe – alongside the May Sinclair or perhaps Gentleman Overboard by Herbert Clyde Lewis (which I have not read but might be similar??)
Lol, now you’ve got me wondering about my interpretation of the second half! I know what I think is happening, but I don’t want to put it here in case of spoilers. Maybe I’ll re-read it at some point and see if I still think what I think!!
Oh I’m sure you’re right! I did some googling afterwards and think my guesses were correct, but…
I’d forgotten about the Tonks- thank you for the reminder! I’d like to read it, although it does sound very odd.
It is! Though curiously less odd than I’d thought it might be
The Bloater was a funny old one, wasn’t it. I read it a couple of holidays ago as it was a BookCrossing book so I could let it travel free. My main takeaway was it was fun as it was but would have been wearing in a longer book. I also liked the work details best! https://librofulltime.wordpress.com/2023/11/15/book-review-rosemary-tonks-the-bloater/
Yes, I think that’s fair – sometimes it’s a relief that someone chose a novella-length